វិគីភីឌា:Training/For students/Training feedback
You can leave a message here to let us know what you thought of the training.
 បណ្ណសារ |
|---|
- What I liked
- test
- What I didn't like
- test
- What was missing
- test
- What was unnecessary
- test
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- test
--Profkls (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
Individual pages were on the short side.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jovyeramela (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--JessicaParrisWestbrook (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very clear and helpful. Not at all overwhelming
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jazzy20 (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Rroserryan (talk)[កែប្រែ]
- What I liked
-
- straight-forward info and specific instructions.
...
- What I didn't like
-
- old fashioned videos
...
- What was missing
-
- how would i know?
...
- What was unnecessary
-
- how to use bold text
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
-
- it was okay. mostly it was too short, and should have had a more careful explanation of using citations. a
...
--Rroserryan (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was concise and informative and didnt stray too much from the key concepts.
- What I didn't like
...Often the videos did not work and I was forced to skip them. Also some of the links seemed irrelevant to the main topic being discussed.
- What was missing
...Nothing! I think it covered most of the major areas.
- What was unnecessary
...Several links in the modules
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was a good intro into the editing process but it may help to include a few more important types of wikiedits to help familiarize the user with other techniques before setting them loose.
--Abhic93 (talk) 20:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I enjoyed all the interactive tutorials in learning about how to add pictures, etc.
- What I didn't like
...I noticed there was lots of text that could be decreased to a few sentences that were to be concise.
- What was missing
...It was missing more pictures and examples. It should have a one page sheet that has all the coding.
- What was unnecessary
...Having a variety of ways of being respectful in wikipedia.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought it was very helpful as it allowed you to click on the actual things so that it seems like you are doing it yourself.
--Aabundo (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...A lot of videos
- What I didn't like
...too long
- What was missing
...not much
- What was unnecessary
...some videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Thelukkolukko (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--TehKevinLewis (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos were very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...A lot of words that made the orientation seem like it took a while.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Great! --JamesBond34 (talk) 22:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
JinelleC09 (talk)[កែប្រែ]
- What I liked
- the videos were very clear!
...
- What I didn't like
- not much!
...
- What was missing
- coding for italics and underline
...
- What was unnecessary
- n/a
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- very useful!
...
--JinelleC09 (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
JinelleC09 (talk)[កែប្រែ]
- What I liked
easy to use
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--JinelleC09 (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was very simple, and yet thought out.
...
- What I didn't like
- I clicked more to get through this than I have in the last month of browsing. (I like fewer clicks, more scrolls)
...
- What was missing
- Honestly more step-by-step tutorials. I benefited highly from the one section on editing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I can't say what was unnecessary until I have become a regular user. Hindsight is 20/20.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- I was a fan of it.
...
--Gaurd.vanforlife (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was thorough. The videos are VERY helpful.
- What I didn't like
Took me a long time; undivided attention.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Only worked for a little bit.
--Karolina7 (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Plloney (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Plloney (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Bulleted list item My interests is becoming an Mechanical Engineer. I want to design rollercoasters.
- Bulleted list item Interests in improving as a freelance sports writer.
- Bulleted list item Interested in College sports and recruiting.Plloney (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked being able to click through the tutorial at my own pace, instead of watching a video.
- What I didn't like
... I liked pretty much everything. The explanations were very thorough. I think that practice will help me to understand how to work Wikipedia editing.
- What was missing
... I do not think anything was missing.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing. I think the information given was concise and necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought that was the best part! I was able to actually try the editing instead of just reading about it.
--KPhillips13 (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was interactive and concise.
- What I didn't like
...Sometimes it linked to other pages and pressing back was annoying.
- What was missing
...A video didn't work
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was very helpful!
--Fcheng62 (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The many explanation videos
- What I didn't like
How long the training took
- What was missing
More interactive editing tutorials
- What was unnecessary
Some explanations in some modules that were pretty common sense
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Really enjoyed it. Need more!
--Kaylerz (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I really liked the interactive tool to set up my sandbox.
- What I didn't like
I didn't like that the interactive tutorial didn't continue through the editing and adding citation process.
- What was missing
I thought that the continuation of the interactive tutorial was missing. I work better when I DO things.
- What was unnecessary
I found all of the information necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I found it INCREDIBLY useful!
--Ecapelle (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The examples and videos that were given.
- What I didn't like
All the text to read was a bit confusing at times.
- What was missing
I feel nothing was missing.
- What was unnecessary
I think all of the information was necessary for helping someone who has never used wikipedia edits before.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I think the interactive editing tool was very helpful.
--Mitc5072 (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dfcater (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
K.ebersole (talk)[កែប្រែ]
- What I liked
I liked the videos that showed the step by step process of some of the editing
- What I didn't like
Some of the wording throughout the tutorial was confusing for someone like me that does not understand much about technology and doing website editing type stuff. Also, I think showing how to add references could have been better explained.
- What was missing
Nothing that I can think of.
- What was unnecessary
All of it was necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was helpful for some of it except adding the references.
--K.ebersole (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very clear.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The box with instructions disappeared when I clicked on the new link I made, and then it started repeating itself. --Chronophoto (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
CrazyBotany (talk)Feedback[កែប្រែ]
- What I liked
I enjoyed the good detail of explanation that was presented in the tutorial. Even though it was pretty lengthy for me, I feel like it covered pretty much all that was necessary. ...
- What I didn't like
As I said, it was a pretty long tutorial, even if it was more or less necessary for some who have never edited anything online before. ...
- What was missing
N/A. ...
- What was unnecessary
N/A. ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
N/A. ...
--CrazyBotany (talk) 22:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was short, and useful. Also, very clear.
...
- What I didn't like
- I wish I could have edited alongside and not in another tab, but I didn't try the interactive tutorial. The coding stuff was a bit hard to follow, but I assume it will become clear when I do it.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing!
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing!
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--13ab37 (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I was fascinated by the way you can change other authors articles and help improve or change facts about a subject.
- What I didn't like
... I did not enjoy going through each step about how to insert a references or images. Personally I thought it took to long of a process and instead of just having it through the manual steps it should be a pop out while writing. I state that because it will commonly forgotten or messed up in the process.
- What was missing
... When going through the steps and information, I do not think any information was missing.
- What was unnecessary
... Just like before when replying to my dislike. I just personally think going through all the inserting information was a waste of time.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bastewart22095 (talk) 02:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sweet Sparrow (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The YouTube videos were helpful because they showed exactly how to use the editing tools and formats.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't like when there was not a video to accompany a section about specific aspects of Wikipedia. In some cases, the explanation was quite confusing when no visual was presented.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing in particular was missing, however, I am still confused about certain things such as going "live." Perhaps a bit more detail could have been provided.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I did not think that anything was particularly unnecessary. Each section seemed to have important information about the proper way to use Wikipedia.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought that it was a great way to learn about the sandbox. It worked really well.
...
--Smorrissey7 (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...clear and concise
- What I didn't like
...I thought it was a pretty good, not many complaints. But you go through a lot of content and can't practice all of it right away. It may be helpful to have an easily accessible tab or page to re-explain editing or citing.
- What was missing
...more editing tutorials
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked it, but I wish it would go through more editing examples! Practicing those things which are demonstrated in later videos would be a big help.
--Ehart25 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The information was detailed and descriptive, clearly explaining the topics.
- What I didn't like
...The computer jargon is definitely more than I am accustomed to and will have to learn.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...All is necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... The individual steps of the tutorial were very helpful and patient
--MissKell (talk) 01:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked that there were YouTube videos to show you steps.
- What I didn't like
...My pull down tab that had the options for example "Cite Book" wont work.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I noticed, it was very helpful.
- What was unnecessary
...I also found nothing unnecessary, it was very informational.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was a very nice and helpful tutorial.
--Cadupps1 (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Clwalden (talk) 05:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I enjoyed the videos and how they expanded on the new information.
...
- What I didn't like
- I enjoyed it all.
...
- What was missing
- Very thorough. No complaints.
...
- What was unnecessary
- N/A
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Slightly difficult to use.
I think this feature should come after the video explaining how to edit properly. ...