Jump to content

សាសនា៖ ភាពខុសគ្នារវាងកំណែនានា

ពីវិគីភីឌា
ខ្លឹមសារដែលបានលុបចោល ខ្លឹមសារដែលបានសរសេរបន្ថែម
No edit summary
បន្ទាត់ទី១៖ បន្ទាត់ទី១៖
{{about|a general set of beliefs about life, purpose, etc.|other uses|Religion (disambiguation)}}
[[ឯកសារ:Angkormonks.jpg|right|thumb|200px|លោកសង្បនៅ[[បា្រសាទអង្គវត្ត]]។]]
{{redirect|Religious|a member of a Catholic [[religious institute]]|Religious (Catholicism)}}
{{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}}
[[File:Religion collage (large).jpg|thumb|right|350px|Religious activities around the world]]
{{Religion by Country}}
{{Spirituality sidebar |width=19.7em}}


A '''religion''' is an organized collection of [[belief system|beliefs]], [[cultural system]]s, and [[world view]]s that relate humanity to an order of existence.<ref group="note">While religion is difficult to define, one standard model of religion, used in [[religious studies]] courses, was proposed by [[Clifford Geertz]], who simply called it a "cultural system" (Clifford Geertz, ''Religion as a Cultural System'', 1973). A critique of Geertz's model by [[Talal Asad]] categorized religion as "an [[anthropology|anthropological]] category." (Talal Asad, ''The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category'', 1982.)</ref> A critique of Geertz's model by [[Talal Asad]] categorized religion as "an [[anthropology|anthropological]] category."<ref>Talal Asad, ''The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category'', 1982</ref> Many religions have [[mythology|narratives]], [[symbol]]s, and [[sacred history|sacred histories]] that are intended to explain the [[meaning of life]] and/or to explain the [[creation myth|origin of life]] or the [[religious cosmology|Universe]]. From their beliefs about the [[cosmos]] and [[human nature]], people derive [[Moral code|morality]], [[ethics]], [[religious law]]s or a preferred [[lifestyle (sociology)|lifestyle]]. According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world.<ref>The Everything World's Religions Book: Explore the Beliefs, Traditions and Cultures of Ancient and Modern Religions, page 1 Kenneth Shouler - 2010</ref>


Many religions may have organized [[religious behaviour|behaviors]], [[clergy]], a definition of what constitutes adherence or membership, [[holy places]], and [[Religious text|scriptures]]. The practice of a religion may also include [[ritual]]s, [[sermon]]s, commemoration or veneration of a [[god|deity]], [[gods]] or [[goddess]]es, [[sacrifice]]s, [[festival]]s, [[Banquet|feasts]], [[trance]], [[initiation]]s, [[funeral|funerary services]], [[matrimony|matrimonial services]], [[meditation]], [[prayer]], [[music]], [[art]], [[dance]], [[Community service|public service]] or other aspects of human culture. Religions may also contain [[mythology]].<ref>[http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/mythology Oxford Dictionaries] mythology, retrieved 9 September 2012</ref>
== និយម​ន័យ​នៃ​ពាក្យ​សាសនា ==


The word ''religion'' is sometimes used interchangeably with ''[[faith]]'', ''[[belief system]]'' or sometimes ''[[dharma|set of duties]]'';<ref>{{cite book|last=Kant|first=Immanuel|title=Religion and Rational Theology|year=2001|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9780521799980|page=177}}</ref> however, in the words of [[Émile Durkheim]], religion differs from private belief in that it is "something eminently social".<ref>Émile Durkheim|Durkheim, E. (1915) ''[[The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life]]''. London: George Allen & Unwin, p.10.</ref> A global 2012 poll reports that 59% of the world's population is religious, and 36% are [[irreligion|not religious]], including 13% who are [[atheism|atheists]], with a 9 percent decrease in religious belief from 2005.<ref name="gia">{{cite web |url=http://www.wingia.com/web/files/richeditor/filemanager/Global_INDEX_of_Religiosity_and_Atheism_PR__6.pdf |title=Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism |publisher=WIN-Gallup International |date=27 July 2012 |accessdate=24 August 2012}}</ref> On average, women are more religious than men.<ref>[http://www.livescience.com/7689-women-religious-men.html Women More Religious Than Men] retrieved 14 July 2013</ref> Some people follow multiple religions or multiple religious principles at the same time, regardless of whether or not the religious principles they follow traditionally allow for [[syncretism]].<ref>Soul Searching:The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers - Page 77, Christian Smith, Melina Lundquist Denton - 2005</ref><ref>Christ in Japanese Culture: Theological Themes in Shusaku Endo's Literary Works, Emi Mase-Hasegawa - 2008</ref><ref>[http://www.christianpost.com/news/new-poll-reveals-how-churchgoers-mix-eastern-new-age-beliefs-42215/ New poll reveals how churchgoers mix eastern new age beliefs] retrieved 26 July 2013</ref>
បើ​តាម​វចនានុក្រម​ខ្មែរ សាសនា មក​​​ពី​ពាក្យ សាសន ដែល​មាន​ន័យ​ថា ពាក្យ​បណ្តាំ, ពាក្យ​ផ្តាំ​ផ្ញើ; ពាក្យ​ប្រៀន​ប្រដៅ, ការ​ប្រៀន​ប្រដៅ; សាសនា, [[លទ្ធិ]]; ពាក្យ​បង្គាប់, ការ​បង្គាប់​បញ្ជា; ដំណឹង; សំបុត្រ; ពាក្យ​ប្រកាស, ការ​ប្រកាស​ប្រាប់; ការ​ជឿ​ស្ដាប់; ការ​ដាក់​ទណ្ឌ​កម្ម, ការ​ផ្ចាល​ទោស; ការ​កែ​សម្រួល; ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង; ការ​ត្រួតត្រា ។


==ពន្យល់ពាក្យ==
== ការអភិវឌ្ឍនៃសាសនា ==


== តំរិះគន់ ==
==មើលផងដែរ==
== កំណត់សំគាល់ ==
==ឯកសារបង្អែក==
== អានបន្តទៀត ==
==បណ្តាខ្សែភ្ជាប់ក្រៅ==


''Religion'' (from O.Fr. ''religion'' "religious community," from L. ''religionem'' (nom. ''religio'') "respect for what is sacred, reverence for the gods,"<ref>{{OEtymD|religion}}</ref> "obligation, the bond between man and the gods"<ref>''[[Shorter Oxford English Dictionary]]</ref>) is derived from the [[Latin language|Latin]] ''[[Glossary of ancient Roman religion#religio|religiō]]'', the ultimate origins of which are obscure. One possibility is an interpretation traced to [[Cicero]], connecting ''{{lang|la|lego}}'' "read", i.e. ''re'' (again) + ''lego'' in the sense of "choose", "go over again" or "consider carefully". Modern scholars such as [[Tom Harpur]] and [[Joseph Campbell]] favor the derivation from ''{{lang|la|ligare}}'' "bind, connect", probably from a prefixed ''{{lang|la|re-ligare}}'', i.e. ''re'' (again) + ''ligare'' or "to reconnect," which was made prominent by [[Augustine of Hippo|St. Augustine]], following the interpretation of [[Lactantius]].<ref>In ''The Pagan Christ: Recovering the Lost Light.'' Toronto. Thomas Allen, 2004. ISBN 0-88762-145-7</ref><ref>In ''[[The Power of Myth]],'' with Bill Moyers, ed. Betty Sue Flowers, New York, Anchor Books, 1991. ISBN 0-385-41886-8</ref> The medieval usage alternates with ''order'' in designating bonded communities like those of [[monastic orders]]: "we hear of the 'religion' of the [[Order of the Golden Fleece|Golden Fleece]], of a knight 'of the [[Order of Aviz|religion of Avys]]'".<ref>[[Johan Huizinga]], ''[[The Autumn of the Middle Ages|The Waning of the Middle Ages]]'' (1919) 1924:75.</ref>


According to the [[philologist]] [[Max Müller]], the root of the English word "religion", the [[Latin]] ''[[:wikt:religio|religio]]'', was originally used to mean only "reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, [[pietas|piety]]" (which [[Cicero]] further derived to mean "diligence").<ref>[[Max Müller]], ''Natural Religion'', p.33, 1889</ref><ref>[http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3D%2340976 Lewis & Short, ''A Latin Dictionary'']</ref> [[Max Müller]] characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What is called ancient religion today, they would have only called "law".<ref>[[Max Müller]]. ''[http://books.google.com/books?pg=PA28&id=aM0FAAAAQAAJ&as_brr=4 Introduction to the science of religion]''. p. 28.</ref>


Many languages have words that can be translated as "religion", but they may use them in a very different way, and some have no word for religion at all. For example, the [[Sanskrit]] word [[dharma]], sometimes translated as "religion", also means law. Throughout classical [[South Asia]], the [[Dharmaśāstra|study of law]] consisted of concepts such as [[Prāyaścitta|penance through piety]] and [[Ācāra|ceremonial as well as practical traditions]]. Medieval Japan at first had a similar union between "imperial law" and universal or "Buddha law", but these later became independent sources of power.<ref>[[Toshio Kuroda|Kuroda, Toshio]] and Jacqueline I. Stone, translator. "[http://web.archive.org/web/20030323095019/http://www.nanzan-u.ac.jp/SHUBUNKEN/publications/jjrs/pdf/477.pdf The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law]." ''Japanese Journal of Religious Studies'' 23.3-4 (1996)</ref><ref>Neil McMullin. ''Buddhism and the State in Sixteenth-Century Japan''. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1984.</ref>


There is no precise equivalent of "religion" in Hebrew, and [[Judaism]] does not distinguish clearly between religious, national, racial, or ethnic identities.<ref>Hershel Edelheit, Abraham J. Edelheit, [http://www.questia.com/library/book/history-of-zionism-a-handbook-and-dictionary-by-abfaham-j-edelheit-hershel-edelheit.jsp History of Zionism: A Handbook and Dictionary], p.3, citing [[Solomon Zeitlin]], ''The Jews. Race, Nation, or Religion?'' ( Philadelphia: Dropsie College Press, 1936).</ref> One of its central concepts is "[[halakha]]", sometimes translated as "law"", which guides religious practice and belief and many aspects of daily life.


The use of other terms, such as obedience to God or [[Islam]] are likewise grounded in particular histories and vocabularies.<ref>Colin Turner. ''Islam without Allah?'' New York: Routledge, 2000. pp. 11-12.</ref>


==និយមន័យ==
'''សាសនា'''គឺជាជំនឿរបស់មនុស្សនៅលើគំនិតមួយ​ ឬ ​ខ្លះ​ដែលគេគិតជាភាពសម្រាប់បូជា ។
មានសាសនាជាច្រើននៅលើផែនដី ។ ​មានខ្លះដែលយ៉ាងចាស់​ដូច​ពុទ្ធសាសនា​​គ្រិស្ដសាសនា​​សាសនាអ៊ីស្លាម​​លទ្ធិហិណ្ឌូ​នឹង​សាសនាពួកជីហ្វ។​មានសាសនាដែល​ជឿនៅ​[[ព្រះ]]តែមួយ​​([[អាទិទេពនិយម]])​និង​មានសាសនាដែលជឿនៅ​[[ទេវ]]ច្រើន​​([[ពហុទេពនិយម]])។


There are numerous definitions of religion and only a few are stated here. The typical dictionary definition of religion refers to a "belief in, or the worship of, a god or gods"<ref>[http://www.chambers.co.uk/dictionaries/the-chambers-dictionary.php ''The Chambers Dictionary''.] Chambers.</ref> or the "service and worship of God or the supernatural".<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/religion Religion]. Merriam-Webster Dictionary.</ref> However, writers and scholars have expanded upon the "belief in god" definitions as insufficient to capture the diversity of religious thought and experience.
== សាសនាយ៉ាងចាស់​ ==


[[Peter Mandaville]] and [[Paul James (academic)|Paul James]] define religion as "a relatively-bounded system of beliefs, symbols and practices that addresses the nature of existence, and in which communion with others and Otherness is lived as if it both takes in and spiritually transcends socially-grounded ontologies of time, space, embodiment and knowing".<ref>{{Cite book | year= 2010 | author= Paul James and Peter Mandaville | title= Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions | url= https://www.academia.edu/4416072/Globalization_and_Culture_Vol._2_Globalizing_Religions_editor_with_Peter_Mandaville_Sage_Publications_London_2010 | publisher= Sage Publications | location= London}}</ref> This definition has the virtue of taking into account the emphasis in the literature on the relationship between the immanent and transcendent without treating it in the modern way as a dualism of two separate worlds. There is no mention of 'God' or 'gods', allowing Buddhism, for example, to be considered a religion.
សាសនាយ៉ាងចាស់​ដែលរស់នៅពេលនេះមានប្រហែល១០០០ឆ្នាំ។​សាសនាមួយគឺជា​​[[លទ្ធិហិណ្ឌូ]]​ដែលមកពី[[ប្រទេសឥណ្ឌា]]។[[​​ព្រះពុទ្ធសាសនា]]​និង[[​​សាសនាពួកហ្វ្សីហ្វ]]​មាន​ជិត​២៥០០ឆ្នាំ​[[គ្រិស្ដសាសនា]]​មាន២០០០ឆ្នាំនិង[[​សាសនាអ៊ីស្លាម]]​១៥០០ឆ្នាំ ។ ​មានសាសនាយ៉ាងចាស់ដែលបាត់ដូច[[សាសនាប្រទេសអេហ្សីប]]​[[ប្រទេសក្រិច]]និង[[ប្រទេសរ៉ូមាំង]] ។


[[File:Urarina shaman B Dean.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Urarina]] [[shaman]], Peru, 1988]]
== អ្នកតំណាងធំជាងគេរបស់សាសនា ==
[[Edward Burnett Tylor]] defined religion as "the belief in spiritual beings".<ref>Tylor, E.B. (1871) ''[http://archive.org/stream/primitiveculture1tylouoft#page/424/mode/2up Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Vol. 1]''. London: John Murray; (p.424).</ref> He argued, back in 1871, that narrowing the definition to mean the belief in a supreme deity or judgment after death or [[idolatry]] and so on, would exclude many peoples from the category of religious, and thus "has the fault of identifying religion rather with particular developments than with the deeper motive which underlies them". He also argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known societies.


The anthropologist [[Clifford Geertz]] defined religion as a "system of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic."<ref>Geertz, C. (1993) ''Religion as a cultural system''. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, Geertz, Clifford, pp.87-125. Fontana Press.</ref> Alluding perhaps to [[Edward Burnett Tylor|Tylor's]] "deeper motive", Geertz remarked that "we have very little idea of how, in empirical terms, this particular miracle is accomplished. We just know that it is done, annually, weekly, daily, for some people almost hourly; and we have an enormous ethnographic literature to demonstrate it".<ref>(''ibid'', p. 90)</ref> The theologian [[Antoine Vergote]] also emphasized the "cultural reality" of religion, which he defined as "the entirety of the linguistic expressions, emotions and, actions and signs that refer to a supernatural being or supernatural beings"; he took the term "supernatural" simply to mean whatever transcends the powers of nature or human agency.<ref name="vergote">Vergote, A. (1996) ''Religion, belief and unbelief. A Psychological Study'', Leuven University Press. (p. 16)</ref>
មានអ្នកតំណាងធំៗរបស់​សាសនាយ៉ាងចាស់ដូចជា [[ព្រះពុទ្ធ]]​នៅពុទ្ធសាសនា ​[[ព្រះយ៉េស៊ូ]]នៅគ្រិស្ដសាសនា និង[[ព្យាការីមហាមេត]]នៅសាសនាអ៊ីស្លាម ។


The sociologist [[Durkheim]], in his seminal book [[The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life]], defined religion as a "unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things".<ref>Durkheim, E. (1915) [http://www.archive.org/details/elementaryformso00durkrich ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life'']. London: George Allen & Unwin.</ref> By sacred things he meant things "set apart and forbidden—beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them". Sacred things are not, however, limited to gods or spirits.<ref group="note">That is how, according to Durkheim, Buddhism is a religion. "In default of gods, Buddhism admits the existence of sacred things, namely, the [[Four Noble Truths|four noble truths]] and the practices derived from them" (''ibid'', p. 45).</ref> On the contrary, a sacred thing can be "a rock, a tree, a spring, a pebble, a piece of wood, a house, in a word, anything can be sacred".<ref>(''ibid'', p. 37)</ref> Religious beliefs, myths, dogmas and legends are the representations that express the nature of these sacred things, and the virtues and powers which are attributed to them.<ref>(''ibid'', pp. 40–41)</ref>
== មើលដែរ ==


In his book [[The Varieties of Religious Experience]], the psychologist [[William James]] defined religion as "the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine".<ref>James, W. (1902) [http://archive.org/details/varietiesreligi02jamegoog ''The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature''.] Longmans, Green, and Co. (p. 31)</ref> By the term "divine" James meant "any object that is god''like'', whether it be a concrete deity or not"<ref>(''ibid'', p. 34)</ref> to which the individual feels impelled to respond with solemnity and gravity.<ref>(''ibid'', p. 38)</ref>
* [[សាសនានៅប្រទេសកម្ពុជា]]


Echoes of James' and Durkheim's definitions are to be found in the writings of, for example, [[Frederick Ferré]] who defined religion as "one's way of valuing most comprehensively and intensively".<ref>Frederick Ferré, F. (1967) ''Basic modern philosophy of religion''. Scribner, (p.82).</ref> Similarly, for the theologian [[Paul Tillich]], faith is "the state of being ultimately concerned",<ref>Tillich, P. (1957) ''Dynamics of faith''. Harper Perennial; (p.1).</ref> which "is itself religion. Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man's spiritual life."<ref>Tillich, P. (1959) ''Theology of Culture''. Oxford University Press; (p.8).</ref> [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]] in the late 18th century defined religion as ''das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl'', commonly translated as "a feeling of absolute dependence".<ref>Hueston A. Finlay. "‘Feeling of absolute dependence’ or ‘absolute feeling of dependence’? A question revisited". ''Religious Studies'' 41.1 (2005), pp.81-94.</ref> His contemporary [[Hegel]] disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as "the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit."<ref>[[Max Müller]]. "Lectures on the origin and growth of religion."</ref>
[[ចំណាត់ថ្នាក់ក្រុម:សាសនា]]

When religion is seen in terms of "sacred", "divine", intensive "valuing", or "ultimate concern", then it is possible to understand why scientific findings and philosophical criticisms (e.g. [[Richard Dawkins]]) do not necessarily disturb its adherents.<ref>Pecorino, P.A. (2001) [http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/pecorip/scccweb/etexts/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_10_DEFINITION/The-Definition-of-Religion.htm ''Philosophy of Religion. Online Textbook'']. Philip A. Pecorino.</ref>

==ទ្រឹស្តី==

===ប្រភព​កំណើត និង ការ​ពង្រីកបន្ថែម===
[[File:Yazilikaya B 12erGruppe.jpg|thumb|250px|The [[Yazılıkaya]] sanctuary in [[Turkey]], with the twelve gods of the underworld]]
The origin of religion is uncertain. There are a number of theories regarding the subsequent origins of organized religious practices.

According to [[anthropologists]] John Monaghan and Peter Just, "Many of the great world religions appear to have begun as revitalization movements of some sort, as the vision of a charismatic prophet fires the imaginations of people seeking a more comprehensive answer to their problems than they feel is provided by everyday beliefs. Charismatic individuals have emerged at many times and places in the world. It seems that the key to long-term success – and many movements come and go with little long-term effect – has relatively little to do with the prophets, who appear with surprising regularity, but more to do with the development of a group of supporters who are able to institutionalize the movement."<ref>{{cite book |title= Social & Cultural Anthropology|edition= |last1= Monaghan|first1= John |last2= Just |first2= Peter |year= 2000|publisher= Oxford University Press|location= New York|isbn= 978-0-19-285346-2|page= 126}}</ref>

The [[development of religion]] has taken different forms in different cultures. Some religions place an emphasis on belief, while others emphasize practice. Some religions focus on the subjective experience of the religious individual, while others consider the activities of the religious community to be most important. Some religions claim to be universal, believing their [[law]]s and [[cosmology]] to be binding for everyone, while others are intended to be practiced only by a closely defined or localized group. In many places religion has been associated with public institutions such as [[education]], [[hospital]]s, the [[family]], [[government]], and [[politics|political]] hierarchies.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite book |title= Social & Cultural Anthropology|edition= |last1= Monaghan|first1= John |last2= Just |first2= Peter |year= 2000|publisher= Oxford University Press|location= New York|isbn= 978-0-19-285346-2|page= 124}}</ref>

Anthropologists John Monoghan and Peter Just state that, "it seems apparent that one thing religion or belief helps us do is deal with problems of human life that are significant, persistent, and intolerable. One important way in which religious beliefs accomplish this is by providing a set of ideas about how and why the world is put together that allows people to accommodate anxieties and deal with misfortune."<ref name=autogenerated1 />

===ចលនា​នៃ​ការ​បង្កើត​ជំនឿសាសនា​ក្នុង​សង្គម===

One modern academic theory of religion, [[social constructionism]], says that religion is a modern concept that suggests all [[spirituality|spiritual]] practice and [[worship]] follows a model similar to the [[Abrahamic religions]] as an orientation system that helps to interpret reality and define human beings.<ref name="vergote 89">Vergote, Antoine, ''Religion, belief and unbelief: a psychological study'', Leuven University Press, 1997, p. 89</ref> Among the main proponents of this theory of religion are Daniel Dubuisson, Timothy Fitzgerald, Talal Asad, and Jason Ānanda Josephson. The social constructionists argue that religion is a modern concept that developed from Christianity and was then applied inappropriately to non-Western cultures.

Daniel Dubuisson, a French anthropologist, says that the idea of religion has changed a lot over time and that one cannot fully understand its development by relying on consistent use of the term, which "tends to minimize or cancel out the role of history".<ref name=dubuisson/> "What the West and the history of religions in its wake have objectified under the name 'religion'", he says, " is ... something quite unique, which could be appropriate only to itself and its own history."<ref name=dubuisson/> He notes that [[St. Augustine]]'s definition of ''religio'' differed from the way we used the modern word "religion".<ref name=dubuisson>Daniel Dubuisson, ''The Western Construction of Religion''</ref>

Dubuisson prefers the term "cosmographic formation" to religion. Dubuisson says that, with the emergence of religion as a category separate from culture and society, there arose [[religious studies]]. The initial purpose of religious studies was to demonstrate the superiority of the "living" or "universal" European world view to the "dead" or "ethnic" religions scattered throughout the rest of the world, expanding the teleological project of [[Schleiermacher]] and [[Cornelis Petrus Tiele|Tiele]] to a worldwide ideal religiousness.<ref>Daniel Dubuisson. "Exporting the Local: Recent Perspectives on 'Religion' as a Cultural Category", ''Religion Compass'', 1.6 (2007), p.792.</ref> Due to shifting theological currents, this was eventually supplanted by a liberal-ecumenical interest in searching for Western-style universal truths in every cultural tradition.<ref>Tomoko Masuzawa, ''The Invention of World Religions.'' Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.</ref>

According to Fitzgerald, religion is not a universal feature of all cultures, but rather a particular idea that first developed in Europe under the influence of [[Christianity]].<ref>{{Cite book|ref=harv|first=Timothy|last=Fitzgerald|title=Discourse on Civility and Barbarity|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2007|pages=45–46}}</ref> Fitzgerald argues that from about the 4th century CE Western Europe and the rest of the world diverged. As Christianity became commonplace, the [[charismatic authority]] identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call "religiousness", exerted a commanding influence at the local level. As the Church lost its dominance during the [[Protestant Reformation]] and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national [[sovereignty]], and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.<ref>{{Harvnb|Fitzgerald|2007|page=194}}</ref> It was at this point that "religion" was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to [[dogma]] in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as a personal choice, only of [[established church]]es. With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, says Fitzgerald, but rather than becoming a universal social attitude, it now became a personal feeling or emotion.<ref>{{Harvnb|Fitzgerald|2007|page=268}}</ref>

Asad argues that before the word "religion" came into common usage, Christianity was a ''disciplina'', a "rule" just like that of the Roman Empire. This idea can be found in the writings of [[St. Augustine]] (354–430). Christianity was then a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. It was the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities, rather than something calling one to self-discipline through symbols.<ref>Talal Asad, ''Genealogies of Religion''. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1993 p.34-35.</ref>

These ideas are developed by [[S. N. Balagangadhara]]. In the [[Age of Enlightenment]], Balagangadhara says that the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of "religion" as a worldwide practice.<ref>S. N. Balagangadhara. ''The Heathen in His Blindness...'' New York: Brill Academic Publishers, 1994. p.159.</ref> This caused such ideas as [[religious freedom]], a reexamination of classical [[philosophy]] as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically [[Deism]] among intellectuals such as [[Voltaire]]. Much like Christianity, the idea of "religious freedom" was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions such as [[India]] that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.<ref name="pennington"/>

More recently, in ''The Invention of Religion in Japan'', Josephson has argued that while the concept of “religion” was Christian in its early formulation, non-Europeans (such as the Japanese) did not just acquiesce and passively accept the term's meaning. Instead they worked to interpret "religion" (and its boundaries) strategically to meet their own agendas and staged these new meanings for a global audience.<ref>Josephson, Jason Ānanda. (2012) ''The Invention of Religion in Japan.'' Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</ref> In nineteenth century [[Japan]], [[Buddhism in Japan|Buddhism]] was radically transformed from a pre-modern philosophy of [[natural law]] into a "religion," as Japanese leaders worked to address domestic and international political concerns. In summary, Josephson argues that the European encounter with other cultures has led to a partial de-Christianization of the category religion. Hence "religion" has come to refer to a confused collection of traditions with no possible coherent definition.<ref>Josephson 2012, p. 257</ref>

[[File:Huxisanxiaotu.jpg|thumb|300px|''[[Confucianism]], [[Taoism]], and [[Buddhism]] are one'', a painting in the ''litang style'' portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, [[Song Dynasty]]]]

[[George Lindbeck]], a [[Lutheran]] and a [[Postliberal theology|postliberal theologian]] (but not a social constructionist), says that religion does not refer to belief in "[[God]]" or a transcendent Absolute, but rather to "a kind of cultural and/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought ... it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”<ref>George A. Lindbeck, ''Nature of Doctrine'' (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1984), 33.</ref>

===ការ​សិក្សា​ប្រៀបធៀប​សាសនា​ទាំងឡាយ===

[[Nicholas de Lange]], Professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies at [[Cambridge University]], says that "The comparative study of religions is an academic discipline which has been developed within Christian theology faculties, and it has a tendency to force widely differing phenomena into a kind of strait-jacket cut to a Christian pattern. The problem is not only that other 'religions' may have little or nothing to say about questions which are of burning importance for Christianity, but that they may not even see themselves as religions in precisely the same way in which Christianity sees itself as a religion."<ref>Nicholas de Lange, ''Judaism'', Oxford University Press, 1986</ref>

==ប្រភេទ​នៃ​សាសនា==

[[File:Prevailing world religions map.png|thumb|450px|A map of [[List of religious populations|major denominations and religions of the world]]]]

===ក្រុមនៃ​សាសនា===

Some scholars classify religions as either ''universal religions'' that seek worldwide acceptance and actively look for new converts, or ''[[ethnic religion]]s'' that are identified with a particular ethnic group and do not seek converts.<ref name="Hinnells">{{Cite book|title=The Routledge companion to the study of religion |last=Hinnells |first=John R. |year=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-33311-3 |pages=439–440 |url=http://books.google.com/?id=IGspjXKxIf8C |accessdate=2009-09-17}}</ref> Others reject the distinction, pointing out that all religious practices, whatever their philosophical origin, are ethnic because they come from a particular culture.<ref>Timothy Fitzgerald. ''The Ideology of Religious Studies''. New York: Oxford University Press USA, 2000.</ref><ref>Craig R. Prentiss. ''Religion and the Creation of Race and Ethnicity''. New York: NYU Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8147-6701-X</ref><ref>Tomoko Masuzawa. ''The Invention of World Religions, or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. ISBN 0-226-50988-5</ref>

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the academic practice of [[comparative religion]] divided religious belief into philosophically defined categories called "world religions." However, some recent scholarship has argued that not all types of religion are necessarily separated by mutually exclusive philosophies, and furthermore that the utility of ascribing a practice to a certain philosophy, or even calling a given practice religious, rather than cultural, political, or social in nature, is limited.<ref name="pennington">Brian Kemble Pennington ''Was Hinduism Invented?'' New York: Oxford University Press US, 2005. ISBN 0-19-516655-8</ref><ref>Russell T. McCutcheon. ''Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion''. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.</ref><ref>Nicholas Lash. ''The beginning and the end of 'religion'.'' Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-56635-5</ref> The current state of psychological study about the nature of religiousness suggests that it is better to refer to religion as a largely invariant phenomenon that should be distinguished from cultural norms (i.e. "religions").<ref>Joseph Bulbulia. "Are There Any Religions? An Evolutionary Explanation." ''Method & Theory in the Study of Religion'' 17.2 (2005), pp.71-100</ref>

Some academics [[Study of religion|studying the subject]] have divided religions into three broad categories:
# [[world religions]], a term which refers to [[Transculturation|transcultural]], [[international]] faiths;
# [[indigenous religions]], which refers to smaller, culture-specific or nation-specific religious groups; and
# [[new religious movements]], which refers to recently developed faiths.<ref>Harvey, Graham (2000). ''Indigenous Religions: A Companion''. (Ed: Graham Harvey). London and New York: Cassell. Page 06.</ref>

===សហប្រតិបត្តិការ​​អន្តរជំនឿ===

Because religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in [[interfaith]] dialogue, cooperation, and [[Religion and peacebuilding|religious peacebuilding]]. The first major dialogue was the [[Parliament of the World's Religions]] at the 1893 [[World's Columbian Exposition|Chicago World's Fair]], which remains notable even today both in affirming "universal values" and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with [[Christian–Jewish reconciliation]] representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.

Recent interfaith initiatives include "A Common Word", launched in 2007 and focused on bringing Muslim and Christian leaders together,<ref>[http://acommonword.com/ A Common Word]</ref> the "C1 World Dialogue",<ref>[http://www.c1worlddialogue.com/ C1 World Dialogue]</ref> the "Common Ground" initiative between Islam and Buddhism,<ref>[http://islambuddhism.com/ Islam and Buddhism Common Ground]</ref> and a [[United Nations]] sponsored "World Interfaith Harmony Week".<ref>[http://worldinterfaithharmonyweek.com/ World Interfaith Harmony Week]</ref><ref>[http://worldinterfaithharmonyweek.com/world-interfaith-harmony-week-resolution/ UN resolution]</ref>

==ក្រុមសាសនា​ទាំងឡាយ==

The list of still-active religious movements given here is an attempt to summarize the most important regional and philosophical influences on local communities, but it is by no means a complete description of every religious community, nor does it explain the most important elements of individual religiousness.

The five largest religious groups by world population, estimated to account for 5 billion people, are Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism (with the relative numbers for Buddhism and Hinduism dependent on the extent of [[syncretism]]) and Chinese folk religion.

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:800px;"
|+
|- style="background:#666688;"
! style="width:250px;"| Five largest religions
! style="width:170px;"| 2012 (billion)<ref name="EB2012">{{cite web |url=http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/ |title=The Global Religious Landscape |author=Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life |accessdate=
December 18, 2012}}</ref>
! style="width:160px;"| 2012 (%)
! style="width:180px;"| 2000 (billion)<ref name="EB2000">{{cite web |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/715463/Religion-Year-In-Review-2000 |title=Religion: Year In Review 2000 |author=Darrell J. Turner |work=Encyclopedia Britannica |accessdate=16 June 2012}}</ref><ref>but cf: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/#religions</ref>
! style="width:160px;"| 2000 (%)
! style="width:200px;"| Demographics
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Christianity]]
| 2.2
| 32%
| 2.0
| 33%
| [[Christianity by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Islam]]
| 1.6
| 23%
| 1.2
| 19.6%
| [[List of countries by Muslim population|Islam by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Hinduism]]
| 1.0
| 15%
| 0.811
| 13.4%
| [[Hinduism by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Buddhism]]
| 0.5
| 7%
| 0.360
| 5.9%
| [[Buddhism by country]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| [[Chinese folk religion]]
| 0.4
| 6%
| 0.385
| 6.4%
| [[Chinese folk religion#Demographics|Chinese folk religion]]
|- style="text-align:center; background:#e0e8ee;"
| Total
| 6.9
| 100%
| 6.15
| 100%
|
|}

===សាសនា​នៅ​ក្នុង​ក្រុម​ជំនឿ​តាម​លោក​អាប្រាហាំ===

[[File:Molnár Ábrahám kiköltözése 1850.jpg|upright|thumb|The patriarch [[Abraham]] (by [[József Molnár (painter)|József Molnár]])]]
[[Abrahamic religions]] are [[monotheistic]] religions which believe they descend from [[Abraham]].
* [[Judaism]] is the oldest Abrahamic religion, originating in the people of [[History of ancient Israel and Judah|ancient Israel and Judea]]. Judaism is based primarily on the [[Torah]], a text which some Jews believe was handed down to the people of Israel through the prophet [[Moses]]. This along with the rest of the [[Hebrew Bible]] and the [[Talmud]] are the central texts of Judaism. The [[Jewish people]] were scattered after the destruction of the [[Temple in Jerusalem]] in 70 CE. Today there are about 13 million Jews, about 40 per cent living in Israel and 40 per cent in the United States.<ref>http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton61/st02_27.pdf</ref>

[[File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd Portrait cropped.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Jesus]] is the central figure of Christianity.]]
* [[Christianity]] is based on the life and teachings of [[Jesus of Nazareth]] (1st century) as presented in the [[New Testament]]. The Christian faith is essentially faith in Jesus as the [[Christ]], the [[Son of God]], and as [[Messiah|Savior]] and Lord. Almost all Christians believe in the [[Trinity]], which teaches the unity of [[God the Father|Father]], [[God the Son|Son]] (Jesus Christ), and [[Holy Spirit]] as three persons in [[monotheism|one Godhead]]. Most Christians can describe their faith with the [[Nicene Creed]]. As the religion of [[Byzantine Empire]] in the first millennium and of [[Western Europe]] during the time of colonization, Christianity has been propagated throughout the world. The main divisions of Christianity are, according to the number of adherents:
** [[Catholic Church]], headed by the [[Pope]] in [[Rome]], is a [[Communion (Christian)|communion]] of the [[Latin Church|Western church]] and 22&nbsp;[[Eastern Catholic Churches|Eastern Catholic churches]].
** [[Protestantism]], separated from the Catholic Church in the 16th-century [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]] and split in many denominations,
** [[Eastern Christianity]], which include [[Eastern Orthodoxy]], [[Oriental Orthodoxy]], and the [[Church of the East]].
::There are other smaller groups, such as [[Jehovah's Witnesses]] and the [[Latter Day Saint movement]], whose inclusion in Christianity is sometimes disputed.{{By whom|date=December 2013}}

[[File:Kaaba mirror edit jj.jpg|upright|thumb|[[Muslim]]s [[Tawaf|circumambulating]] the [[Kaaba]], the most sacred site in [[Islam]]]]
* [[Islam]] is based on the [[Quran]], one of the [[Islamic holy books|holy books]] considered by Muslims to be [[Wahy|revealed]] by [[God in Islam|God]], and on the [[Hadith|teachings (hadith)]] of the [[Prophets of Islam|Islamic prophet]] [[Muhammad]], a major political and religious figure of the 7th century CE. Islam is the most widely practiced religion of [[Southeast Asia]], [[North Africa]], [[Western Asia]], and [[Central Asia]], while Muslim-majority countries also exist in parts of [[South Asia]], [[Sub-Saharan Africa]], and [[Southeast Europe]]. There are also several [[Islamic republic]]s, including [[Iran]], [[Pakistan]], [[Mauritania]], and [[Afghanistan]].
** [[Sunni Islam]] is the largest denomination within Islam and follows the Quran, the hadiths which record the [[sunnah]], whilst placing emphasis on the [[sahabah]].
** [[Shia Islam]] is the second largest denomination of Islam and its adherents believe that [[Ali]] succeeded prophet Muhammad and further places emphasis on prophet Muhammads family.
** [[Ahmadiyya]] adherents believe that the awaited Imam [[Mahdi]] and the Promised Messiah has arrived, believed to be [[Mirza Ghulam Ahmad]] by Ahmadis.
** Other denominations of Islam include [[Nation of Islam]], [[Ibadi]], [[Sufism]], [[Quranism]], [[Mahdavia]], and [[non-denominational Muslims]]. [[Wahhabism]] is the dominant Muslim [[Maddhab|schools of thought]] in the [[Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]].
* The [[Bahá'í Faith]] is an Abrahamic religion founded in 19th century Iran and since then has spread worldwide. It teaches unity of all religious philosophies and accepts all of the prophets of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as well as additional prophets including its founder [[Bahá'u'lláh]].

* Smaller regional Abrahamic groups, including [[Samaritanism]] (primarily in Israel and the West Bank), the [[Rastafari movement]] (primarily in Jamaica), and [[Druze]] (primarily in Syria and Lebanon).

===សាសនា​នៅ​ប្រទេស​អ៊ីរ៉ង់===

[[File:Maneckji Sett Agiary entrance.jpg|upright|thumb|[[Zoroastrian]] [[Fire Temple]]]]
[[Iranian religions]] are ancient religions whose roots predate the [[Islamization]] of [[Greater Iran]]. Nowadays these religions are practiced only by minorities.
* [[Zoroastrianism]] is a religion and philosophy based on the teachings of prophet [[Zoroaster]] in the 6th century BC. The Zoroastrians worship the [[Creator deity|Creator]] [[Ahura Mazda]]. In Zoroastrianism good and evil have distinct sources, with evil trying to destroy the creation of Mazda, and good trying to sustain it.

* [[Mandaeism]] is a [[monotheistic]] religion with a strongly [[Dualism|dualistic]] worldview. Mandaeans are sometime labeled as the "Last [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]".

* [[Religion in Kurdistan|Kurdish religions]] include the traditional beliefs of the [[Yazidi]], [[Alevi]], and [[Ahl-e Haqq]]. Sometimes these are labeled [[Yazdânism]].

===សាសនា​នៅ​ប្រទេស​ឥណ្ឌា===

[[File:Rama, Lakshman and Sita at the Kalaram Temple, Nashik..jpg|upright|thumb|[[Hindu]] statue of [[Rama]] in Kalaram Temple ([[India]])]]
[[File:Astasahasrika Prajnaparamita Dharmacakra Discourse.jpeg|thumb|upright|The [[Buddha]], in a [[Sanskrit]] manuscript, [[Nalanda|Nālandā]], Bihar, India]]
[[Indian religions]] are practiced or were founded in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. They are sometimes classified as the ''dharmic religions'', as they all feature [[dharma]], the specific law of reality and duties expected according to the religion.<ref>{{cite book|last=Mittal|first=Sushil|title=Surprising Bedfellows: Hindus and Muslims in Medieval and Early Modern India|year=2003|publisher=Lexington Books|isbn=9780739106730|page=103}}</ref>
* [[Hinduism]] is a [[synecdoche]] describing the similar philosophies of [[Vaishnavism]], [[Shaivism]], and [[Hindu denominations|related groups]] practiced or founded in the [[Indian subcontinent]]. Concepts most of them share in common include [[karma]], [[caste]], [[reincarnation]], [[mantra]]s, [[yantra]]s, and [[darśana]].<ref group="note">Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition" etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in Gavin Flood (2003), pp. 1-17. [[René Guénon]] in his'' [[Introduction to the Study of the Hindu doctrines]]'' (1921 ed.), Sophia Perennis, ISBN 0-900588-74-8, proposes a definition of the term "religion" and a discussion of its relevance (or lack of) to Hindu doctrines (part II, chapter 4, p. 58).</ref> Hinduism is the most ancient of still-active religions,<ref>P. 484 ''Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions'' By Wendy Doniger, M. Webster, Merriam-Webster, Inc</ref><ref>P. 219 ''Faith, Religion & Theology'' By Brennan Hill, Paul F. Knitter, William Madges</ref> with origins perhaps as far back as prehistoric times.<ref>P. 6 ''The World's Great Religions'' By Yoshiaki Gurney Omura, Selwyn Gurney Champion, Dorothy Short</ref> Hinduism is not a monolithic religion but a religious category containing dozens of separate philosophies amalgamated as [[Sanātana Dharma]], which is the name with whom Hinduism has been known throughout history by its followers.

* [[Jainism]], taught primarily by [[Parsva]] (9th century BCE) and [[Mahavira]] (6th century BCE), is an ancient Indian religion that prescribes a path of non-violence for all forms of living beings in this world. Jains are found mostly in India.

* [[Buddhism]] was founded by [[Gautama Buddha|Siddhattha Gotama]] in the 6th century BCE. Buddhists generally agree that Gotama aimed to help [[Sentient beings (Buddhism)|sentient beings]] end their [[dukkha|suffering (dukkha)]] by understanding the [[dharma|true nature of phenomena]], thereby escaping the cycle of suffering and rebirth ([[Saṃsāra (Buddhism)|saṃsāra]]), that is, achieving [[Nirvana (Buddhism)|nirvana]].
** [[Theravada]] Buddhism, which is practiced mainly in [[Sri Lanka]] and Southeast Asia alongside folk religion, shares some characteristics of Indian religions. It is based in a large collection of texts called the [[Pali Canon]].
** [[Mahayana]] Buddhism (or the "Great Vehicle") under which are a multitude of doctrines that became prominent [[Buddhism in China|in China]] and are still relevant [[Buddhism in Vietnam|in Vietnam]], [[Buddhism in Korea|Korea]], [[Buddhism in Japan|Japan]] and to a lesser extent [[Buddhism in the West|in Europe and the United States]]. Mahayana Buddhism includes such disparate teachings as [[Zen]], [[Pure Land Buddhism|Pure Land]], and [[Soka Gakkai]].
** [[Vajrayana]] Buddhism first appeared in India in the 3rd century CE.<ref>Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony (2000), Buddhist Thought: A complete introduction to the Indian tradition, Routledge, ISBN 0-203-18593-5 p=194</ref> It is currently most prominent in the Himalaya regions<ref>Smith, E. Gene (2001). Among Tibetan Texts: History and Literature of the Himalayan Plateau. Boston: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-179-3</ref> and extends across all of Asia<ref>''Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary'', ISBN 4-7674-2015-6</ref> (cf. [[Mikkyō]]).
** Two notable new Buddhist sects are [[Hòa Hảo]] and the [[Dalit Buddhist movement]], which were developed separately in the 20th century.

[[File:GuruNanakFresco-Goindwal.jpg|thumb|170px|Fresco of [[Guru Nanak]] at [[Goindwal Sahib]] [[Gurdwara]]]]
* [[Sikhism]] is a monotheistic religion founded on the teachings of [[Guru Nanak]] and ten successive [[Sikh gurus]] in 15th century [[Punjab region|Punjab]]. It is the [[Major religious groups|fifth-largest]] organized religion in the world, with approximately 30 million Sikhs.<ref>{{cite news|title=Sikhism: What do you know about it?|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/sikhism-what-do-you-know-about-it/2012/08/06/19131ef6-dff1-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_gallery.html|accessdate=13 December 2012|newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Zepps|first=Josh|title=Sikhs in America: What You Need To Know About The World's Fifth-Largest Religion|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/sikhs-in-america_n_1748125.html|accessdate=13 December 2012|newspaper=Huffington Post|date=6 August 2012}}</ref> [[Sikh]]s are expected to embody the qualities of a ''Sant-Sipāhī''—a saint-soldier, have control over one's internal [[Five Thieves|vices]] and be able to be constantly immersed in virtues clarified in the [[Guru Granth Sahib]]. The principal beliefs of Sikhi are faith in ''[[Waheguru]]''—represented by the phrase ''{{unicode|[[ik Onkar|ik ōaṅkār]]}}'', meaning one God, who prevails in everything, along with a [[praxis (process)|praxis]] in which the Sikh is enjoined to engage in social reform through the pursuit of justice for all human beings.

===ប្រពៃណី​នៃ​ជនជាតិ​នៅ​ទ្វីបអាហ្វ្រិក===

{{Main|Traditional African religion}}
[[Traditional African religion|African traditional religion]] encompasses the traditional religious beliefs of people in Africa. There are also notable [[African diasporic religions]] practiced in the Americas.

North Africa:
*[[Traditional Berber religion]] (Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya)
*[[Ancient Egyptian religion]] (Egypt, Sudan)

Northeast Africa:
*[[Waaq]] (Horn of Africa)

[[File:Brooklyn Museum 1992.133.4 Figure of Shango on Horseback.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Shango]], the [[Orisha]] (god) of fire, lightning, and thunder, in the [[Yoruba religion]], depicted on horseback]]
West Africa:
*[[Akan religion]] (Ghana)
*[[Dahomey mythology|Dahomey (Fon) mythology]] (Benin)
*[[Efik mythology]] (Nigeria, Cameroon)
*[[Odinani]] of the [[Igbo people]] (Nigeria, Cameroon)
*[[Serer religion]] (Senegal, Gambia)
*[[Yoruba religion]] (Nigeria, Benin)

Central Africa:
*[[Bantu mythology]] (Central, Southeast, and Southern Africa)
*[[Bushongo mythology]] (Congo)
*[[Mbuti mythology|Mbuti (Pygmy) mythology]] (Congo)
*[[Lugbara mythology]] (Congo)
*[[Dinka religion]] (South Sudan)
*[[Lotuko mythology]] (South Sudan)

Southeast Africa:
*[[Bantu mythology]] (Central, Southeast, and Southern Africa)
*[[Akamba mythology]] (Kenya)
*[[Masai mythology]] (Kenya, Tanzania)
*[[Malagasy mythology]] (Madagascar)

Southern Africa:
*[[Bantu mythology]] (Central, Southeast, and Southern Africa)
*[[San religion]] (South Africa)
*[[Lozi mythology]] (Zambia)
*[[Tumbuka mythology]] (Malawi)
*[[Zulu mythology]] (South Africa)

Diaspora:
{{Main|African diasporic religions}}
*[[Santeria]] (Cuba)
*[[Candomble]] (Brazil)
*[[Haitian Vodun|Vodun]] (Haiti, United States)
*[[Lucumi religion|Lucumi]] (Caribbean)
*[[Umbanda]] (Brazil)
*[[Macumba]] (Brazil)

===ជំនឿ​​តាម​ស្រុក​ភូមិ​===

[[File:Chinese temple incence burner.jpg|right|thumb|upright|[[Incense]] burner in China]]
The term ''folk'' refers to a broad category of traditional religions that includes [[shamanism]] and elements of [[animism]] and [[ancestor worship]], where ''traditional'' means "indigenous, that which is aboriginal or foundational, handed down from generation to generation…".<ref>J. O. Awolalu (1976) [http://www.studiesincomparativereligion.com/uploads/ArticlePDFs/268.pdf What is African Traditional Religion?] Studies in Comparative Religion Vol. 10, No. 2. (Spring, 1976).</ref> These are religions that are closely associated with a particular group of people, ethnicity or tribe; they often have no formal creeds or sacred texts.<ref name="pew global">Pew Research Center (2012) [http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape.aspx The Global Religious Landscape. A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010]. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.</ref> Some faiths are [[syncretic]], fusing diverse religious beliefs and practices.<ref name="CIA">{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2122.html |title=Religions |author=Central Intelligence Agency |work=World Factbook |accessdate=3 January 2013}}</ref>

* [[Chinese folk religion]], e.g.: those aspects of [[Confucianism]] and [[Taoism]] which are seen as religious by outsiders, as well as some Mahayana Buddhism. New religious movements include [[Falun Gong]] and [[I-Kuan Tao]].

* Other folk religions in Asia-Pacific region, e.g.: [[Cheondoism]], [[Korean shamanism]], [[Shinbutsu-shūgō]] and [[Modekngei]].

* [[Australian Aboriginal mythology]].

* Folk religions of the Americas, e.g.: [[Native American mythology|Native American religion]]

Folk religions are often omitted as a category in surveys even in countries where they are widely practiced, e.g. in China.<ref name="pew global" />

===សាសនា​បង្កើត​ឡើង​ពេល​ថ្មីៗ===

[[File:Sepulveda Unitarian Universalist Society Sanctuary.PNG|thumb|upright|A [[Modernism|Modern-style]] Unitarian Universalist sanctuary]]
[[New religious movement]]s include:
* [[Japanese new religions|Shinshūkyō]] is a general category for a wide variety of religious movements founded in Japan since the 19th century. These movements share almost nothing in common except the place of their founding. The largest religious movements centered in Japan include [[Soka Gakkai]], [[Tenrikyo]], and [[Seicho-No-Ie]] among hundreds of smaller groups.

* [[Cao Đài]] is a syncretistic, monotheistic religion, established in [[Vietnam]] in 1926.

* [[Raëlism]] is a new religious movement founded in 1974 teaching that humans were created by aliens. It is numerically the world's largest [[UFO religion]].

* [[Hindu reform movements]], such as [[Ayyavazhi]], [[Swaminarayan Faith]] and [[Ananda Marga]], are examples of new religious movements within Indian religions.

* [[Unitarian Universalism]] is a religion characterized by support for a "free and responsible search for truth and meaning", and has no accepted [[creed]] or [[theology]].

* [[Noahidism]] is a Biblical-Talmudic and monotheistic ideology for non-Jews based on the Seven Laws of Noah, and on their traditional interpretations within Judaism.

* [[Scientology]] teaches that people are immortal beings who have forgotten their true nature. Its method of spiritual rehabilitation is a type of counseling known as [[Auditing (Scientology)|auditing]], in which practitioners aim to consciously re-experience and understand painful or traumatic events and decisions in their past in order to free themselves of their limiting effects.

* [[Eckankar]] is a pantheistic religion with the purpose of making God an everyday reality in one's life.

* [[Wicca]] is a neo-pagan religion first popularised in 1954 by British civil servant [[Gerald Gardner (Wiccan)|Gerald Gardner]], involving the worship of a God and Goddess.

* [[Neo-Druidism|Druidry]] is a religion promoting harmony with nature, and drawing on the practices of the druids.

* [[Satanism]] is a broad category of religions that, for example, worship Satan as a deity ([[Theistic Satanism]]) or use "Satan" as a symbol of carnality and earthly values ([[LaVeyan Satanism]]).

[[Sociological classifications of religious movements]] suggest that within any given religious group, a community can resemble various types of structures, including "churches", "denominations", "sects", "cults", and "institutions".

==បញ្ហាចម្រូងចម្រាស់==

===សេដ្ឋកិច្ច===

[[File:Religion economy.png|thumb|400px|The national income of countries correlates negatively with their [[religiosity]].<ref name="gia"/>]]
{{Main|Economics of religion}}
{{Further|Religion and business|Wealth and religion}}
While there has been much debate about how religion affects the economy of countries, in general there is a negative correlation between religiosity and the wealth of nations. In other words, the richer a nation is, the less religious it tends to be.<ref name=WIN-Gallup>{{cite web|last=WIN-Gallup|title=Global Index of religion and atheism.|url=http://redcresearch.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/RED-C-press-release-Religion-and-Atheism-25-7-12.pdf|accessdate=21 October 2012}}</ref> However, sociologist and political economist [[Max Weber]] has argued that Protestant Christian countries are wealthier because of their [[Protestant work ethic]].<ref>Max Weber, [1904] 1920. ''[[The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]]''</ref>

===សុខភាព===

{{Main|Impacts of religion on health}}
[[Mayo Clinic]] researchers examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality, and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. The authors reported that: "Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide."<ref name="Religion and Medicine">{{cite web|title=Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Medicine: Implications for Clinical Practice|url=http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0025-6196/PIIS0025619611627997.pdf|quote=We reviewed published studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and subject reviews that examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. We also reviewed articles that provided suggestions on how clinicians might assess and support the spiritual needs of patients. Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide|author=Paul S. Mueller, MD; David J. Plevak, MD; Teresa A. Rummans, MD|accessdate=13 November 2010}}</ref>

The authors of a subsequent study concluded that the influence of religion on health is "largely beneficial", based on a review of related literature.<ref>{{cite journal | title = The Role of Religion and Spirituality in Mental and Physical Health | journal = Current Directions in Psychological Science | date = Feb 2001 | first = Kevin S. | last = Seybold | coauthors = Peter C. Hill | volume = 10 | issue = 1 | pages = 21–24 | doi = 10.1111/1467-8721.00106}}</ref> According to academic James W. Jones, several studies have discovered "positive correlations between religious belief and practice and mental and physical health and longevity." <ref>{{cite journal | title = Religion, Health, and the Psychology of Religion: How the Research on Religion and Health Helps Us Understand Religion | journal = Journal of Religion and Health | year = 2004 | first = James W. | last = Jones | volume = 43 | issue = 4 | pages = 317–328 | doi = 10.1007/s10943-004-4299-3}}</ref>

An analysis of data from the 1998 US General Social Survey, whilst broadly confirming that religious activity was associated with better health and well-being, also suggested that the role of different dimensions of spirituality/religiosity in health is rather more complicated. The results suggested "that it may not be appropriate to generalize findings about the relationship between spirituality/religiosity and health from one form of spirituality/religiosity to another, across denominations, or to assume effects are uniform for men and women.<ref>Maselko, J. and Kubzansky, L. D. (2006) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.008 ''Gender differences in religious practices, spiritual experiences and health: Results from the US General Social Survey'']. Social Science & Medicine, Vol 62(11), June, 2848-2860.</ref>

===អំពើហិង្សា===

{{main|Religious violence}}
{{See also|Christianity and violence|Judaism and violence|Islam and violence}}

[[File:SiegeofAntioch.jpeg|thumb|The [[Crusades]] were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between [[Christian]] [[Europe]] and [[Muslim]]s. Shown here is a battle scene from the [[First Crusade]].]]

Charles Selengut characterizes the phrase "religion and violence" as "jarring", asserting that "religion is thought to be opposed to violence and a force for peace and reconciliation. He acknowledges, however, that "the history and scriptures of the world's religions tell stories of violence and war as they speak of peace and love."<ref name=Selengut>{{cite book |title=Sacred fury: understanding religious violence |first=Charles |last=Selengut|page=1|url=http://books.google.com/?id=mOqtEkGlq0cC&pg=PR7&dq=%22sectarian+violence%22+%22religious+violence%22#v=onepage&q=%22sectarian%20violence%22%20%22religious%20violence%22&f=false |isbn=978-0-7425-6084-0 |date=2008-04-28}}
</ref>

[[Hector Avalos]] argues that, because religions claim divine favor for themselves, over and against other groups, this sense of righteousness leads to violence because conflicting claims to superiority, based on unverifiable appeals to God, cannot be adjudicated objectively.<ref>{{cite book|title=Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence |first=Hector |last=Avalos|publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, New York|year=2005}}</ref>

Critics of religion [[Christopher Hitchens]] and [[Richard Dawkins]] go further and argue that religions do tremendous harm to society by using violence to promote their goals, in ways that are endorsed and exploited by their leaders.<ref name="Hitchens 2007">{{Cite book|last=Hitchens|first=Christopher|title=God is not Great|publisher=Twelve|year=2007}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}<ref name="Dawkins 2006">{{Cite book|last=Dawkins|first=Richard|title=The God Delusion|publisher=Bantam Books|year=2006}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2010}}

Regina Schwartz argues that all monotheistic religions are inherently violent because of an exclusivism that inevitably fosters violence against those that are considered outsiders.<ref name=ReginaSchwartz>{{cite book |title=The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism By Regina M. Schwartz |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1998}}</ref> Lawrence Wechsler asserts that Schwartz isn't just arguing that Abrahamic religions have a violent legacy, but that the legacy is actually genocidal in nature.<ref>{{cite web |last=Wechsler |first=Lawrence |title=Mayhem and Monotheism|url=http://faculty.plts.edu/gpence/2490/PDF/mayhem.pdf}}</ref>

Byron Bland asserts that one of the most prominent reasons for the "rise of the secular in Western thought" was the reaction against the religious violence of the 16th and 17th centuries. He asserts that "(t)he secular was a way of living with the religious differences that had produced so much horror. Under secularity, political entities have a warrant to make decisions independent from the need to enforce particular versions of religious orthodoxy. Indeed, they may run counter to certain strongly held beliefs if made in the interest of common welfare. Thus, one of the important goals of the secular is to limit violence."<ref>{{cite web |first=Byron |last=Bland |title=Evil Enemies: The Convergence of Religion and Politics|url=http://www.law.stanford.edu/program/centers/scicn/papers/religion_and_political_violence.pdf |date = May 2003|page=4}}</ref>

Nonetheless, believers have used similar arguments when responding to atheists in these discussions, pointing to the [[Criticism of atheism#Atheism and totalitarian regimes|widespread imprisonment and mass murder]] of individuals under [[state atheism|atheist states]] in the twentieth century:<ref name="John S. Feinberg, Paul D. Feinberg">{{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/books?id=Nl-f5SKq9mgC&pg=PA697&dq=Aleksandr+Solzhenitsyn+But+if+I+were+asked+today+to+formulate+as+concisely+as+possible+the+main+cause+of+the+ruinous+revolution+that+swallowed+up+some+60+million+of+our+people,+I+could+not+put+it+more+accurately+than+to+repeat:+'Men+have+forgotten+God;+that's+why#v=onepage&q&f=false|author=[[John S. Feinberg]], [[Paul D. Feinberg]]|title =Ethics for a Brave New World|publisher =[[Crossway Books]]|quote=Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.' Since then I have spend well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.'|accessdate = 2007-10-18|isbn = 9781433526466|year = 2010}}</ref><ref name="Genocide">{{cite web|url = http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5527|title =The Real Murderers: Atheism or Christianity?|publisher =[[Greg Koukl|Stand To Reason]]|author=Gregory Koukl|accessdate = 2007-10-18|authorlink = Greg Koukl}}</ref><ref name="Totalitarianism and Atheism">{{cite web|url = http://catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0214.htm|title =Answering Atheist’s Arguments|publisher = Catholic Education Resource Center|author=Dinesh D'Souza|accessdate = 2007-10-18|authorlink = Dinesh D'Souza}}</ref>
{{quote|And who can deny that Stalin and Mao, not to mention Pol Pot and a host of others, all committed atrocities in the name of a Communist ideology that was explicitly atheistic? Who can dispute that they did their bloody deeds by claiming to be establishing a 'new man' and a religion-free utopia? These were mass murders performed with atheism as a central part of their ideological inspiration, they were not mass murders done by people who simply happened to be atheist.|[[Dinesh D'Souza]]<ref name="Totalitarianism and Atheism"/>}}

In response to such a line of argument, however, author [[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]] writes:
{{quote|The problem with fascism and communism, however, is not that they are too critical of religion; the problem is that they are too much like religions. Such regimes are dogmatic to the core and generally give rise to personality cults that are indistinguishable from cults of religious hero worship. Auschwitz, the gulag and the killing fields were not examples of what happens when human beings reject religious dogma; they are examples of political, racial and nationalistic dogma run amok. There is no society in human history that ever suffered because its people became too reasonable.|[[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]]<ref>[http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/harris06/harris06_index.html 10 myths and 10 truths about Atheism] Sam Harris</ref>}}

Richard Dawkins has stated that Stalin's atrocities were influenced not by atheism but by dogmatic [[Marxism]],<ref name='God_Delusion7'>{{Cite book| last = Dawkins | first = Richard | authorlink = Richard Dawkins | coauthors = | title = The God Delusion | publisher = Houghton Mifflin | date = 2006-09-18| location = Ch. 7| url = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Delusion | doi = | id = | isbn = 978-0-618-68000-9 |ref=harv}}</ref> and concludes that while Stalin and Mao happened to be atheists, they did not do their deeds in the name of atheism.<ref>Interview with Richard Dawkins conducted by Stephen Sackur for BBC News 24’s HardTalk programme, July 24th 2007. [http://richarddawkins.net/article,1454,Richard-Dawkins-on-Hardtalk,BBC-Richard-Dawkins]</ref> On other occasions, Dawkins has replied to the argument that [[Adolf Hitler]] and Josef Stalin were antireligious with the response that Hitler and Stalin also grew moustaches, in an effort to show the argument as fallacious.<ref>[http://richarddawkins.net/articles/915 The Video: Bill O'Reilly Interviews Richard Dawkins]</ref>
Instead, Dawkins argues in ''[[The God Delusion]]'' that "What matters is not whether Hitler and Stalin were atheists, but whether atheism systematically influences people to do bad things. There is not the smallest evidence that it does."
Dawkins adds that Hitler in fact, repeatedly affirmed a strong belief in Christianity,<ref name="Speeches">Baynes, Norman H., ed. (1969). ''The Speeches of Adolf Hitler: April 1922-August 1939''. New York: Howard Fertig. pp. 19-20, 37, 240, 370, 371, 375, 378, 382, 383, 385-388, 390-392, 398-399, 402, 405-407, 410, 1018, 1544, 1594.</ref> but that his atrocities were no more attributable to [[Religious views of Adolf Hitler|his theism]] than Stalin's or Mao's were to their atheism. In all three cases, he argues, the perpetrators' level of religiosity was incidental.<ref>{{Harvnb|Dawkins|2006|page=309}}</ref>
D'Souza responds that an individual need not explicitly invoke atheism in committing atrocities if it is already implied in his worldview, as is the case in Marxism.<ref name="D'Souza 2">[http://catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0214.htm Answering Atheist’s Arguments] Dinesh D'Souza</ref>

===ច្បាប់===
{{main|Law and Religion}}
The study of law and religion is a relatively new field, with several thousand scholars involved in law schools, and academic departments including political science, religion, and history since 1980.<ref>John Witte, "The Study of Law and Religion in the United States: An Interim Report", ''Ecclesiastical Law Journal'' (2012) 14#3, pp. 327–354.</ref> Scholars in the field are not only focused on strictly legal issues about religious freedom or non-establishment, but also study religions as they are qualified through judicial discourses or legal understanding of religious phenomena. Exponents look at canon law, natural law, and state law, often in a comparative perspective.<ref>Norman Doe, ''Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction'' (2011).</ref><ref>W. Cole Durham and Brett G. Scharffs, eds., ''Law and religion: national, international, and comparative perspectives'' (Aspen Pub, 2010).</ref> Specialists have explored themes in western history regarding Christianity and justice and mercy, rule and equity, and discipline and love.<ref>John Witte Jr. and Frank S. Alexander, eds., ''Christianity and Law: An Introduction'' (Cambridge U.P. 2008)</ref> Common topics of interest include marriage and the family<ref>John Witte Jr., ''From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition'' (1997).</ref> and human rights.<ref>John Witte, Jr., ''The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism'' (2008).</ref> Outside of Christianity, scholars have looked at law and religion links in the Muslim Middle East<ref>Ann Elizabeth Mayer, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/840165 in JSTOR "Law and Religion in the Muslim Middle East"], ''American Journal of Comparative Law'' (1987) 35#1, pp. 127–184.</ref> and pagan Rome.<ref>Alan Watson, ''The state, law, and religion: pagan Rome'' (University of Georgia Press, 1992).</ref>

Studies have focused on [[secularization]].<ref>Silvio Ferrari, "Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective", ''Ecclesiastical Law Journal'' (2012) 14#3, pp. 355–370.</ref><ref>Rafael Palomino, "Legal dimensions of secularism: challenges and problems", ''Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice'' (2012) vol. 2, pp. 208–225.</ref> In particular the issue of wearing religious symbols in public, such as headscarves that are banned in French schools, have received scholarly attention in the context of human rights and feminism.<ref>Karima Bennoune, "Secularism and human rights: A contextual analysis of headscarves, religious expression, and women's equality under international law", ''Columbia Journal of Transnational Law'', 45 (2006): 367.</ref>

===វិទ្យាសាស្ត្រ===
{{Main|Relationship between religion and science|Epistemology}}

Religious knowledge, according to religious practitioners, may be gained from religious leaders, [[sacred texts]], [[scriptures]], or personal [[revelation]]. Some religions view such knowledge as unlimited in scope and suitable to answer any question; others see religious knowledge as playing a more restricted role, often as a complement to knowledge gained through physical observation. Adherents to various religious faiths often maintain that religious knowledge obtained via sacred texts or revelation is absolute and infallible and thereby creates an accompanying [[religious cosmology]], although the proof for such is often [[tautology (rhetoric)|tautological]] and generally limited to the religious texts and revelations that form the foundation of their belief.

In contrast, the [[scientific method]] gains knowledge by testing hypotheses to develop [[theories]] through elucidation of facts or evaluation by [[experiment]]s and thus only answers [[physical cosmology|cosmological]] questions about the [[universe]] that can be observed and measured. It develops [[theory|theories]] of the world which best fit physically observed evidence. All scientific knowledge is subject to later refinement, or even outright rejection, in the face of additional evidence. Scientific theories that have an overwhelming preponderance of favorable evidence are often treated as ''[[de facto]]'' verities in general parlance, such as the theories of [[general relativity]] and [[natural selection]] to explain respectively the mechanisms of [[gravity]] and [[evolution]].

Regarding religion and science, [[Albert Einstein]] states (1940): "For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action; it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts…Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determine the goals, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up." <ref>{{cite journal | title = Personal God Concept Causes Science-Religion Conflict | journal = The Science News-Letter | date = 21 Sep 1940 | first = Albert | last = Einstein | volume = 38 | issue = 12 | pages = 181–182 | jstor = 3916567 | doi = 10.2307/3916567}}</ref>

===ការ​បូជា​សត្វ===
{{main|Animal sacrifice}}
Animal sacrifice is the ritual killing and offering of an animal to appease or maintain favour with a deity. Such forms of sacrifice are practised within many religions around the world and have appeared historically in almost all cultures.

==ទម្រង់ទាក់ទង​គ្នា​នៃ​​គំនិត==

===អបិយជំនឿ===

{{Further|Superstition|Magical thinking|Magic and religion}}
Superstition has been described as "the incorrect establishment of cause and effect" or a false conception of causation.<ref>[http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~kfoster/FosterKokko2008%20Proc%20B%20superstition.pdf Kevin R. Foster and Hanna Kokko, "The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour", ''Proc. R. Soc. B'' (2009) 276, 31–37]{{dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref> Religion is more complex and includes social institutions and morality. But religions may include superstitions or make use of magical thinking. Adherents of one religion sometimes think of other religions as superstition.<ref>{{Cite book
|title=[[Religion Explained]]
|last=Boyer
|authorlink= Pascal Boyer
|chapter=Why Belief
|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=wreF80OHTicC&pg=PA297&lpg=PA297&dq=%22fang+too+were+quite+amazed%22
|year=2001
}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Fitzgerald|2007|page=232}}</ref>
Some [[atheists]], [[deists]], and [[skeptics]] regard religious belief as superstition.

Greek and Roman pagans, who saw their relations with the gods in political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods (''deisidaimonia''), as a slave might fear a cruel and capricious master. The Romans called such fear of the gods ''superstitio''.<ref>Veyne 1987, p 211 {{Clarify|date=September 2010}}</ref> [[Early Christianity]] was outlawed as a ''superstitio Iudaica'', a "Jewish superstition", by [[Domitian]] in the 80s AD. In AD 425, when Rome had become Christian, [[Theodosius II]] outlawed [[Ancient Roman religion|pagan traditions]] as superstitious.

The Roman Catholic Church considers superstition to be sinful in the sense that it denotes a lack of trust in the divine providence of God and, as such, is a violation of the first of the Ten Commandments. The [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] states that superstition "in some sense represents a perverse excess of religion" (para. #2110). "Superstition," it says, "is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. Matthew 23:16-22" (para. #2111)

===ទេវកថា===

{{Main|Mythology}}
The word ''myth'' has several meanings.
# A traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon;
# A person or thing having only an imaginary or unverifiable existence; or
# A metaphor for the spiritual potentiality in the human being.<ref>Joseph Campbell, ''The Power of Myth'', p. 22 ISBN 0-385-24774-5</ref>

Ancient [[polytheism|polytheistic]] religions, such as those of [[Ancient Greece|Greece]], [[Ancient Rome|Rome]], and [[Scandinavia]], are usually categorized under the heading of [[mythology]]. Religions of pre-industrial peoples, or [[culture]]s in development, are similarly called "myths" in the [[anthropology of religion]]. The term "myth" can be used pejoratively by both religious and non-religious people. By defining another person's religious stories and beliefs as mythology, one implies that they are less real or true than one's own religious stories and beliefs. [[Joseph Campbell]] remarked, "Mythology is often thought of as ''other people's'' religions, and religion can be defined as mis-interpreted mythology."<ref>Joseph Campbell, ''Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor''. Ed. Eugene Kennedy. New World Library ISBN 1-57731-202-3.</ref>

In sociology, however, the term ''myth'' has a non-pejorative meaning. There, ''myth'' is defined as a story that is important for the group whether or not it is objectively or provably true. Examples include the death and [[resurrection]] of [[Jesus]], which, to Christians, explains the means by which they are freed from sin and is also ostensibly a historical event. But from a mythological outlook, whether or not the event actually occurred is unimportant. Instead, the [[symbol]]ism of the death of an old "life" and the start of a new "life" is what is most significant. Religious believers may or may not accept such symbolic interpretations.
{{clear}}

==អសាសនានិយម និង ការមិន​​ប្រកាន់ជំនឿសាសនា==

{{Main|Secularism| Secularization |Irreligion}}
{{See also|Atheism|Agnosticism|Antireligion|Humanism}}
[[File:Ranjitsingh.gif|thumb|upright|[[Ranjit Singh]] established [[Ranjit Singh#Secular Sikh rule|secular rule]] over [[Punjab region|Punjab]] in the early 19th century.]]

The terms "[[atheist]]" (lack of belief in any gods) and "agnostic" (belief in the unknowability of the existence of gods), though specifically contrary to theistic (e.g. Christian, Jewish, and Muslim) religious teachings, do not by definition mean the opposite of "religious". There are religions (including Buddhism and Taoism), in fact, that classify some of their followers as agnostic, atheistic, or [[nontheism|nontheistic]]. The true opposite of "religious" is the word "irreligious". [[Irreligion]] describes an absence of any religion; [[antireligion]] describes an active opposition or aversion toward religions in general.

As religion became a more personal matter in Western culture, discussions of society became more focused on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes (dominantly Christian) were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, [[Ludwig Feuerbach]] recast Christian beliefs in light of [[humanism]], paving the way for [[Karl Marx]]'s famous characterization of religion as "[[Opium of the people|the opium of the people]]". Meanwhile, in the scientific community, [[Thomas Henry Huxley|T.H. Huxley]] in 1869 coined the term "[[agnostic]]," a term—subsequently adopted by such figures as [[Robert G. Ingersoll|Robert Ingersoll]]—that, while directly conflicting with and novel to Christian tradition, is accepted and even embraced in some other religions. Later, [[Bertrand Russell]] told the world ''[[Why I Am Not a Christian]]'', which influenced several later authors to discuss their breakaway from their own religious upbringings from Islam to Hinduism.

Some atheists also construct [[parody religion]]s, for example, the [[Church of the SubGenius]] or the [[Flying Spaghetti Monster]], which parodies the equal time argument employed by [[intelligent design]] [[Creationism]].<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/2006-03-26-spaghetti-monster_x.htm USA Today - Spaghetti Monster is noodling around with faith]</ref> Parody religions may also be considered a [[post-modern]] approach to religion. For instance, in [[Discordianism]], it may be hard to tell if even these "serious" followers are not just taking part in an even bigger joke. This joke, in turn, may be part of a greater path to enlightenment, and so on ''ad infinitum''.

===ការរិះគន់សាសនា===
{{main|Criticism of religion}}

Religious criticism has a long history, going back at least as far as the 5th century [[BCE]]. During classical times, there were religious critics in [[ancient Greece]], such as [[Diagoras of Melos|Diagoras "the atheist" of Melos]], and in the 1st century BCE in [[ancient Rome|Rome]], with [[Titus Lucretius Carus]]'s ''[[De Rerum Natura]]''.

During the [[Middle Ages]] and continuing into the [[Renaissance]], potential critics of religion were persecuted and largely forced to remain silent. There were notable critics like [[Giordano Bruno]], who was burned at the stake for disagreeing with religious authority.<ref>[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/bruno00.htm BRUNO His Life and Thought];[http://galileo.rice.edu/chr/bruno.html Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)]</ref>

In the 17th and 18th century with the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]], thinkers like [[David Hume]] and [[Voltaire]] criticized religion.

In the 19th century, [[Charles Darwin]] and the [[theory of evolution]] led to increased skepticism about religion. [[Thomas Huxley]], [[Jeremy Bentham]], [[Karl Marx]], [[Charles Bradlaugh]], [[Robert G. Ingersoll|Robert Ingersol]], and [[Mark Twain]] were noted 19th-century and early-20th-century critics. In the 20th century, [[Bertrand Russell]], [[Siegmund Freud]], and others continued religious criticism.

[[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]], [[Daniel Dennett]], [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Victor J. Stenger]], and the late [[Christopher Hitchens]] were active critics during the late 20th century and early 21st century.

Critics consider religion to be outdated, harmful to the individual (e.g. [[brainwashing]] of children, [[faith healing]], [[female genital mutilation]], [[circumcision]]), harmful to society (e.g. [[religious war|holy wars]], [[terrorism]], wasteful distribution of resources), to impede the progress of [[science]], to exert social control, and to encourage immoral acts (e.g. [[human sacrifice|blood sacrifice]], [[homophobia|discrimination against homosexuals]] [[misogyny|and women]], and certain forms of [[sexual violence]] such as [[marital rape]]).<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/nov/08/islam-channel-ofcom Islam Channel censured by Ofcom | Media | theguardian.com]</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7843909.stm BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Cleric 'must deny' views on rape]</ref><ref>[http://www.adn.com/2011/07/22/1980301/readers-blast-valley-paper-over.html Valley paper criticized over pastor's column on spousal rape | Alaska Newsreader | ADN.com]</ref> A major criticism of many religions is that they require beliefs that are irrational, unscientific, or unreasonable, because religious beliefs and traditions lack scientific or rational foundations.

Some modern-day critics, such as [[Bryan Caplan]], hold that religion lacks utility in human society; they may regard religion as irrational.<ref>{{cite web|title=Why Religious Beliefs Are Irrational, and Why Economists Should Care|author=Bryan Caplan | url=http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/ldebate.htm}} The article about religion and irrationality.</ref> Nobel Peace Laureate [[Shirin Ebadi]] has spoken out against undemocratic Islamic countries justifying "oppressive acts" in the name of Islam.<ref>Earth Dialogues 2006 Conference, Brisbane. "In these countries, Islamic rulers want to solve 21st century issues with laws belonging to 14 centuries ago. Their views of human rights are exactly the same as it was 1400 years ago."</ref>

==សូមអាន​បន្ថែម==

{{Portal|Religion|Spirituality}}
{{Main|Outline of religion|Index of religion-related articles}}
{{div col|2}}
* [[Belief]]
* [[Cult (religious practice)]]
* [[Life stance]]
* [[List of foods with religious symbolism]]
* [[List of religious populations]]
* [[List of religious texts]]
* [[Morality and religion]]
* [[Nontheistic religions]]
* [[Philosophy of religion]]
* [[Priest]]
* [[Religion and happiness]]
* [[Religion and peacebuilding]]
* [[Religions by country]]
* [[Religious conversion]]
* [[Sociology of religion]]
* [[Temple]]
* [[Theocracy]]
* [[Timeline of religion]]
{{div col end}}

==ឯកសារ​យោង==
{{Reflist|2}}

==កំណត់សម្គាល់==
{{Reflist| group="note"}}

==គន្ធនិទ្ទេស==

<div class="references-small">
* Saint Augustine; ''The Confessions of Saint Augustine'' (John K. Ryan translator); Image (1960), ISBN 0-385-02955-1.
* Barzilai, Gad; ''Law and Religion''; The International Library of Essays in Law and Society; Ashgate (2007), ISBN 978-0-7546-2494-3
* {{Cite book| last = Brodd | first = Jefferey | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = World Religions | publisher = Saint Mary's Press | year = 2003 | location = Winona, MN | pages = | url = | doi = | isbn = 978-0-88489-725-5}}
* Descartes, René; ''Meditations on First Philosophy''; Bobbs-Merril (1960), ISBN 0-672-60191-5.
* Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); ''Our Oriental Heritage''; MJF Books (1997), ISBN 1-56731-012-5.
* Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); ''Caesar and Christ''; MJF Books (1994), ISBN 1-56731-014-1
* Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); ''The Age of Faith''; Simon & Schuster (1980), ISBN 0-671-01200-2.
* [[Marija Gimbutas]] 1989. ''The Language of the Goddess''. Thames and Hudson New York
* Gonick, Larry; ''The Cartoon History of the Universe''; Doubleday, vol. 1 (1978) ISBN 0-385-26520-4, vol. II (1994) ISBN#0-385-42093-5, W. W. Norton, vol. III (2002) ISBN 0-393-05184-6.
* Haisch, Bernard ''The God Theory: Universes, Zero-point Fields, and What's Behind It All''—discussion of science vs. religion ([http://www.thegodtheory.com/preface.html Preface]{{dead link|date=January 2011}}), Red Wheel/Weiser, 2006, ISBN 1-57863-374-5
* Ramsay, Michael, ''Abp.'' ''Beyond Religion?'' Cincinnati, Ohio: Forward Movement Publications, (cop. 1964).
* Lao Tzu; ''Tao Te Ching'' (Victor H. Mair translator); Bantam (1998).
* Marx, Karl; "Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right", ''Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher'', (1844).
* Palmer, Spencer J., ''et al''. ''Religions of the World: a Latter-day Saint [Mormon] View''. 2nd general ed., tev. and enl. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1997. xv, 294 p., ill. ISBN 0-8425-2350-2
* Saler, Benson; "Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories" (1990), ISBN 1-57181-219-9
* Schuon, Frithjof. ''The Transcendent Unity of Religions'', in series, ''Quest Books.'' 2nd Quest ... rev. ed. Wheaton, Ill.: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993, cop. 1984. xxxiv, 173 p. ISBN 0-8356-0587-6
* ''The Holy Bible'', King James Version; New American Library (1974).
* ''The Koran''; Penguin (2000), ISBN 0-14-044558-7.
* ''The Origin of Live & Death'', African Creation Myths; Heinemann (1966).
* ''Poems of Heaven and Hell from Ancient Mesopotamia''; Penguin (1971).
* ''The World Almanac'' (annual), World Almanac Books, ISBN 0-88687-964-7.
* ''[http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/160/11/1965 The Serotonin System and Spiritual Experiences]'' - American Journal of Psychiatry 160:1965-1969, November 2003.
* United States Constitution
* ''Selected Work'' Marcus Tullius Cicero
* ''The World Almanac'' (for numbers of adherents of various religions), 2005
* Religion [First Edition]. Winston King. ''Encyclopedia of Religion''. Ed. Lindsay Jones. Vol. 11. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. p7692-7701.
* ''World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective'' by [[Andrey Korotayev]], Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2004, ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.

'''On religion definition''':
* The first major study: [[Émile Durkheim|Durkheim, Emile]] (1976) ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life.'' London: George Allen & Unwin (in French 1912, English translation 1915).
* [[Wilfred Cantwell Smith]] ''The Meaning and End of Religion'' (1962) notes that the concept of religion as an ideological community and system of doctrines, developed in the 15th and 16th centuries CE.
* A distillation of the Western folk category of religion: [[Clifford Geertz|Geertz, Clifford]]. 1993 [1966]. ''[http://web.archive.org/web/20070925190332/http://resources.theology.ox.ac.uk/library/data/pdf/THD0111.pdf Religion as a cultural system]''. pp.&nbsp;87–125 in Clifford Geertz, ''[http://books.google.com/books?hl=it&lr=&id=BZ1BmKEHti0C The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays]''. London: Fontana Press.
* An [[operational definition]]: [[Anthony F. C. Wallace|Wallace, Anthony F. C.]] 1966. ''Religion: An Anthropological View''. New York: Random House. (p.&nbsp;62-66)
* A recent overview: ''[http://www.anpere.net/2007/2.pdf A Scientific Definition of Religion]''. By Ph.D. James W. Dow.
* Origines de l'homme - De la matière à la conscience, ''Yves Coppens'', De Vive Voix, Paris, 2010
* La preistoria dell’uomo, ''Yves Coppens'', Jaka Book, Milano, 2011

'''Studies of religion in particular geographical areas''':
* A. Khanbaghi. ''The Fire, the Star and the Cross: Minority Religions in Medieval and Early Modern Iran'' (IB Tauris; 2006) 268 pages. Social, political and cultural history of religious minorities in Iran, c. 226-1722 AD.
</div>

==ស្រាវជ្រាវអាន​បន្ថែម==
* {{Cite book | year= 2010 | author= Paul James and Peter Mandaville | title= Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions | url= https://www.academia.edu/4416072/Globalization_and_Culture_Vol._2_Globalizing_Religions_editor_with_Peter_Mandaville_Sage_Publications_London_2010 | publisher= Sage Publications | location= London}}
* Noss, John B.; ''Man's Religions'', 6th ed.; Macmillan Publishing Co. (1980). ''N.B''.: The first ed. appeared in 1949, ISBN 0-02-388430-4.

==ភ្ជាប់​ទៅ​បណ្តាញ​ខាង​ក្រៅ==
{{Commons category}}
{{Wikiquote}}
* [http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/govpubs/us/religion.htm Religion Statistics] from ''UCB Libraries GovPubs''
* {{dmoz|Society/Religion_and_Spirituality}}
* [http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents] by Adherents.com August 2005
* [http://www.iacsr.com/ IACSR - International Association for the Cognitive Science of Religion]
* [http://www.as.ua.edu/rel/studyingreligion.html Studying Religion] - Introduction to the methods and scholars of the academic study of religion
* [http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm#05 A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right] - Marx's original reference to religion as the ''opium of the people''.
* [http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss16/gunn.shtml The Complexity of Religion and the Definition of “Religion” in International Law] Harvard Human Rights Journal article from the President and Fellows of Harvard College(2003)
* [http://www.religionfacts.com/big_religion_chart.htm The Big Religion Chart] detailed facts on major religions

{{Religion topics|state=expanded}}
{{philosophy of religion}}
{{Philosophy topics}}

[[Category:Religion| ]]

{{Link FA|ca}}
{{Link FA|nah}}
{{Link FA|sco}}

កំណែនៅ ម៉ោង១៤:៥៤ ថ្ងៃអាទិត្យ ទី២០ ខែកក្កដា ឆ្នាំ២០១៤

Religious activities around the world

ទំព័រគំរូ:Religion by Country ទំព័រគំរូ:Spirituality sidebar

A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence.[note ១] A critique of Geertz's model by Talal Asad categorized religion as "an anthropological category."[១] Many religions have narratives, symbols, and sacred histories that are intended to explain the meaning of life and/or to explain the origin of life or the Universe. From their beliefs about the cosmos and human nature, people derive morality, ethics, religious laws or a preferred lifestyle. According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world.[២]

Many religions may have organized behaviors, clergy, a definition of what constitutes adherence or membership, holy places, and scriptures. The practice of a religion may also include rituals, sermons, commemoration or veneration of a deity, gods or goddesses, sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trance, initiations, funerary services, matrimonial services, meditation, prayer, music, art, dance, public service or other aspects of human culture. Religions may also contain mythology.[៣]

The word religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith, belief system or sometimes set of duties;[៤] however, in the words of Émile Durkheim, religion differs from private belief in that it is "something eminently social".[៥] A global 2012 poll reports that 59% of the world's population is religious, and 36% are not religious, including 13% who are atheists, with a 9 percent decrease in religious belief from 2005.[៦] On average, women are more religious than men.[៧] Some people follow multiple religions or multiple religious principles at the same time, regardless of whether or not the religious principles they follow traditionally allow for syncretism.[៨][៩][១០]

ពន្យល់ពាក្យ

Religion (from O.Fr. religion "religious community," from L. religionem (nom. religio) "respect for what is sacred, reverence for the gods,"[១១] "obligation, the bond between man and the gods"[១២]) is derived from the Latin religiō, the ultimate origins of which are obscure. One possibility is an interpretation traced to Cicero, connecting lego "read", i.e. re (again) + lego in the sense of "choose", "go over again" or "consider carefully". Modern scholars such as Tom Harpur and Joseph Campbell favor the derivation from ligare "bind, connect", probably from a prefixed re-ligare, i.e. re (again) + ligare or "to reconnect," which was made prominent by St. Augustine, following the interpretation of Lactantius.[១៣][១៤] The medieval usage alternates with order in designating bonded communities like those of monastic orders: "we hear of the 'religion' of the Golden Fleece, of a knight 'of the religion of Avys'".[១៥]

According to the philologist Max Müller, the root of the English word "religion", the Latin religio, was originally used to mean only "reverence for God or the gods, careful pondering of divine things, piety" (which Cicero further derived to mean "diligence").[១៦][១៧] Max Müller characterized many other cultures around the world, including Egypt, Persia, and India, as having a similar power structure at this point in history. What is called ancient religion today, they would have only called "law".[១៨]

Many languages have words that can be translated as "religion", but they may use them in a very different way, and some have no word for religion at all. For example, the Sanskrit word dharma, sometimes translated as "religion", also means law. Throughout classical South Asia, the study of law consisted of concepts such as penance through piety and ceremonial as well as practical traditions. Medieval Japan at first had a similar union between "imperial law" and universal or "Buddha law", but these later became independent sources of power.[១៩][២០]

There is no precise equivalent of "religion" in Hebrew, and Judaism does not distinguish clearly between religious, national, racial, or ethnic identities.[២១] One of its central concepts is "halakha", sometimes translated as "law"", which guides religious practice and belief and many aspects of daily life.

The use of other terms, such as obedience to God or Islam are likewise grounded in particular histories and vocabularies.[២២]

និយមន័យ

There are numerous definitions of religion and only a few are stated here. The typical dictionary definition of religion refers to a "belief in, or the worship of, a god or gods"[២៣] or the "service and worship of God or the supernatural".[២៤] However, writers and scholars have expanded upon the "belief in god" definitions as insufficient to capture the diversity of religious thought and experience.

Peter Mandaville and Paul James define religion as "a relatively-bounded system of beliefs, symbols and practices that addresses the nature of existence, and in which communion with others and Otherness is lived as if it both takes in and spiritually transcends socially-grounded ontologies of time, space, embodiment and knowing".[២៥] This definition has the virtue of taking into account the emphasis in the literature on the relationship between the immanent and transcendent without treating it in the modern way as a dualism of two separate worlds. There is no mention of 'God' or 'gods', allowing Buddhism, for example, to be considered a religion.

Urarina shaman, Peru, 1988

Edward Burnett Tylor defined religion as "the belief in spiritual beings".[២៦] He argued, back in 1871, that narrowing the definition to mean the belief in a supreme deity or judgment after death or idolatry and so on, would exclude many peoples from the category of religious, and thus "has the fault of identifying religion rather with particular developments than with the deeper motive which underlies them". He also argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known societies.

The anthropologist Clifford Geertz defined religion as a "system of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic."[២៧] Alluding perhaps to Tylor's "deeper motive", Geertz remarked that "we have very little idea of how, in empirical terms, this particular miracle is accomplished. We just know that it is done, annually, weekly, daily, for some people almost hourly; and we have an enormous ethnographic literature to demonstrate it".[២៨] The theologian Antoine Vergote also emphasized the "cultural reality" of religion, which he defined as "the entirety of the linguistic expressions, emotions and, actions and signs that refer to a supernatural being or supernatural beings"; he took the term "supernatural" simply to mean whatever transcends the powers of nature or human agency.[២៩]

The sociologist Durkheim, in his seminal book The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, defined religion as a "unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things".[៣០] By sacred things he meant things "set apart and forbidden—beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them". Sacred things are not, however, limited to gods or spirits.[note ២] On the contrary, a sacred thing can be "a rock, a tree, a spring, a pebble, a piece of wood, a house, in a word, anything can be sacred".[៣១] Religious beliefs, myths, dogmas and legends are the representations that express the nature of these sacred things, and the virtues and powers which are attributed to them.[៣២]

In his book The Varieties of Religious Experience, the psychologist William James defined religion as "the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine".[៣៣] By the term "divine" James meant "any object that is godlike, whether it be a concrete deity or not"[៣៤] to which the individual feels impelled to respond with solemnity and gravity.[៣៥]

Echoes of James' and Durkheim's definitions are to be found in the writings of, for example, Frederick Ferré who defined religion as "one's way of valuing most comprehensively and intensively".[៣៦] Similarly, for the theologian Paul Tillich, faith is "the state of being ultimately concerned",[៣៧] which "is itself religion. Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man's spiritual life."[៣៨] Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as das schlechthinnige Abhängigkeitsgefühl, commonly translated as "a feeling of absolute dependence".[៣៩] His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as "the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of Himself through the finite spirit."[៤០]

When religion is seen in terms of "sacred", "divine", intensive "valuing", or "ultimate concern", then it is possible to understand why scientific findings and philosophical criticisms (e.g. Richard Dawkins) do not necessarily disturb its adherents.[៤១]

ទ្រឹស្តី

ប្រភព​កំណើត និង ការ​ពង្រីកបន្ថែម

The Yazılıkaya sanctuary in Turkey, with the twelve gods of the underworld

The origin of religion is uncertain. There are a number of theories regarding the subsequent origins of organized religious practices.

According to anthropologists John Monaghan and Peter Just, "Many of the great world religions appear to have begun as revitalization movements of some sort, as the vision of a charismatic prophet fires the imaginations of people seeking a more comprehensive answer to their problems than they feel is provided by everyday beliefs. Charismatic individuals have emerged at many times and places in the world. It seems that the key to long-term success – and many movements come and go with little long-term effect – has relatively little to do with the prophets, who appear with surprising regularity, but more to do with the development of a group of supporters who are able to institutionalize the movement."[៤២]

The development of religion has taken different forms in different cultures. Some religions place an emphasis on belief, while others emphasize practice. Some religions focus on the subjective experience of the religious individual, while others consider the activities of the religious community to be most important. Some religions claim to be universal, believing their laws and cosmology to be binding for everyone, while others are intended to be practiced only by a closely defined or localized group. In many places religion has been associated with public institutions such as education, hospitals, the family, government, and political hierarchies.[៤៣]

Anthropologists John Monoghan and Peter Just state that, "it seems apparent that one thing religion or belief helps us do is deal with problems of human life that are significant, persistent, and intolerable. One important way in which religious beliefs accomplish this is by providing a set of ideas about how and why the world is put together that allows people to accommodate anxieties and deal with misfortune."[៤៣]

ចលនា​នៃ​ការ​បង្កើត​ជំនឿសាសនា​ក្នុង​សង្គម

One modern academic theory of religion, social constructionism, says that religion is a modern concept that suggests all spiritual practice and worship follows a model similar to the Abrahamic religions as an orientation system that helps to interpret reality and define human beings.[៤៤] Among the main proponents of this theory of religion are Daniel Dubuisson, Timothy Fitzgerald, Talal Asad, and Jason Ānanda Josephson. The social constructionists argue that religion is a modern concept that developed from Christianity and was then applied inappropriately to non-Western cultures.

Daniel Dubuisson, a French anthropologist, says that the idea of religion has changed a lot over time and that one cannot fully understand its development by relying on consistent use of the term, which "tends to minimize or cancel out the role of history".[៤៥] "What the West and the history of religions in its wake have objectified under the name 'religion'", he says, " is ... something quite unique, which could be appropriate only to itself and its own history."[៤៥] He notes that St. Augustine's definition of religio differed from the way we used the modern word "religion".[៤៥]

Dubuisson prefers the term "cosmographic formation" to religion. Dubuisson says that, with the emergence of religion as a category separate from culture and society, there arose religious studies. The initial purpose of religious studies was to demonstrate the superiority of the "living" or "universal" European world view to the "dead" or "ethnic" religions scattered throughout the rest of the world, expanding the teleological project of Schleiermacher and Tiele to a worldwide ideal religiousness.[៤៦] Due to shifting theological currents, this was eventually supplanted by a liberal-ecumenical interest in searching for Western-style universal truths in every cultural tradition.[៤៧]

According to Fitzgerald, religion is not a universal feature of all cultures, but rather a particular idea that first developed in Europe under the influence of Christianity.[៤៨] Fitzgerald argues that from about the 4th century CE Western Europe and the rest of the world diverged. As Christianity became commonplace, the charismatic authority identified by Augustine, a quality we might today call "religiousness", exerted a commanding influence at the local level. As the Church lost its dominance during the Protestant Reformation and Christianity became closely tied to political structures, religion was recast as the basis of national sovereignty, and religious identity gradually became a less universal sense of spirituality and more divisive, locally defined, and tied to nationality.[៤៩] It was at this point that "religion" was dissociated with universal beliefs and moved closer to dogma in both meaning and practice. However there was not yet the idea of dogma as a personal choice, only of established churches. With the Enlightenment religion lost its attachment to nationality, says Fitzgerald, but rather than becoming a universal social attitude, it now became a personal feeling or emotion.[៥០]

Asad argues that before the word "religion" came into common usage, Christianity was a disciplina, a "rule" just like that of the Roman Empire. This idea can be found in the writings of St. Augustine (354–430). Christianity was then a power structure opposing and superseding human institutions, a literal Kingdom of Heaven. It was the discipline taught by one's family, school, church, and city authorities, rather than something calling one to self-discipline through symbols.[៥១]

These ideas are developed by S. N. Balagangadhara. In the Age of Enlightenment, Balagangadhara says that the idea of Christianity as the purest expression of spirituality was supplanted by the concept of "religion" as a worldwide practice.[៥២] This caused such ideas as religious freedom, a reexamination of classical philosophy as an alternative to Christian thought, and more radically Deism among intellectuals such as Voltaire. Much like Christianity, the idea of "religious freedom" was exported around the world as a civilizing technique, even to regions such as India that had never treated spirituality as a matter of political identity.[៥៣]

More recently, in The Invention of Religion in Japan, Josephson has argued that while the concept of “religion” was Christian in its early formulation, non-Europeans (such as the Japanese) did not just acquiesce and passively accept the term's meaning. Instead they worked to interpret "religion" (and its boundaries) strategically to meet their own agendas and staged these new meanings for a global audience.[៥៤] In nineteenth century Japan, Buddhism was radically transformed from a pre-modern philosophy of natural law into a "religion," as Japanese leaders worked to address domestic and international political concerns. In summary, Josephson argues that the European encounter with other cultures has led to a partial de-Christianization of the category religion. Hence "religion" has come to refer to a confused collection of traditions with no possible coherent definition.[៥៥]

Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism are one, a painting in the litang style portraying three men laughing by a river stream, 12th century, Song Dynasty

George Lindbeck, a Lutheran and a postliberal theologian (but not a social constructionist), says that religion does not refer to belief in "God" or a transcendent Absolute, but rather to "a kind of cultural and/or linguistic framework or medium that shapes the entirety of life and thought ... it is similar to an idiom that makes possible the description of realities, the formulation of beliefs, and the experiencing of inner attitudes, feelings, and sentiments.”[៥៦]

ការ​សិក្សា​ប្រៀបធៀប​សាសនា​ទាំងឡាយ

Nicholas de Lange, Professor of Hebrew and Jewish Studies at Cambridge University, says that "The comparative study of religions is an academic discipline which has been developed within Christian theology faculties, and it has a tendency to force widely differing phenomena into a kind of strait-jacket cut to a Christian pattern. The problem is not only that other 'religions' may have little or nothing to say about questions which are of burning importance for Christianity, but that they may not even see themselves as religions in precisely the same way in which Christianity sees itself as a religion."[៥៧]

ប្រភេទ​នៃ​សាសនា

A map of major denominations and religions of the world

ក្រុមនៃ​សាសនា

Some scholars classify religions as either universal religions that seek worldwide acceptance and actively look for new converts, or ethnic religions that are identified with a particular ethnic group and do not seek converts.[៥៨] Others reject the distinction, pointing out that all religious practices, whatever their philosophical origin, are ethnic because they come from a particular culture.[៥៩][៦០][៦១]

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the academic practice of comparative religion divided religious belief into philosophically defined categories called "world religions." However, some recent scholarship has argued that not all types of religion are necessarily separated by mutually exclusive philosophies, and furthermore that the utility of ascribing a practice to a certain philosophy, or even calling a given practice religious, rather than cultural, political, or social in nature, is limited.[៥៣][៦២][៦៣] The current state of psychological study about the nature of religiousness suggests that it is better to refer to religion as a largely invariant phenomenon that should be distinguished from cultural norms (i.e. "religions").[៦៤]

Some academics studying the subject have divided religions into three broad categories:

  1. world religions, a term which refers to transcultural, international faiths;
  2. indigenous religions, which refers to smaller, culture-specific or nation-specific religious groups; and
  3. new religious movements, which refers to recently developed faiths.[៦៥]

សហប្រតិបត្តិការ​​អន្តរជំនឿ

Because religion continues to be recognized in Western thought as a universal impulse, many religious practitioners have aimed to band together in interfaith dialogue, cooperation, and religious peacebuilding. The first major dialogue was the Parliament of the World's Religions at the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, which remains notable even today both in affirming "universal values" and recognition of the diversity of practices among different cultures. The 20th century has been especially fruitful in use of interfaith dialogue as a means of solving ethnic, political, or even religious conflict, with Christian–Jewish reconciliation representing a complete reverse in the attitudes of many Christian communities towards Jews.

Recent interfaith initiatives include "A Common Word", launched in 2007 and focused on bringing Muslim and Christian leaders together,[៦៦] the "C1 World Dialogue",[៦៧] the "Common Ground" initiative between Islam and Buddhism,[៦៨] and a United Nations sponsored "World Interfaith Harmony Week".[៦៩][៧០]

ក្រុមសាសនា​ទាំងឡាយ

The list of still-active religious movements given here is an attempt to summarize the most important regional and philosophical influences on local communities, but it is by no means a complete description of every religious community, nor does it explain the most important elements of individual religiousness.

The five largest religious groups by world population, estimated to account for 5 billion people, are Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism (with the relative numbers for Buddhism and Hinduism dependent on the extent of syncretism) and Chinese folk religion.

Five largest religions 2012 (billion)[៧១] 2012 (%) 2000 (billion)[៧២][៧៣] 2000 (%) Demographics
Christianity 2.2 32% 2.0 33% Christianity by country
Islam 1.6 23% 1.2 19.6% Islam by country
Hinduism 1.0 15% 0.811 13.4% Hinduism by country
Buddhism 0.5 7% 0.360 5.9% Buddhism by country
Chinese folk religion 0.4 6% 0.385 6.4% Chinese folk religion
Total 6.9 100% 6.15 100%

សាសនា​នៅ​ក្នុង​ក្រុម​ជំនឿ​តាម​លោក​អាប្រាហាំ

The patriarch Abraham (by József Molnár)

Abrahamic religions are monotheistic religions which believe they descend from Abraham.

  • Judaism is the oldest Abrahamic religion, originating in the people of ancient Israel and Judea. Judaism is based primarily on the Torah, a text which some Jews believe was handed down to the people of Israel through the prophet Moses. This along with the rest of the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud are the central texts of Judaism. The Jewish people were scattered after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 CE. Today there are about 13 million Jews, about 40 per cent living in Israel and 40 per cent in the United States.[៧៤]
Jesus is the central figure of Christianity.
There are other smaller groups, such as Jehovah's Witnesses and the Latter Day Saint movement, whose inclusion in Christianity is sometimes disputed.[ដោយនរណា?]
Muslims circumambulating the Kaaba, the most sacred site in Islam
  • Smaller regional Abrahamic groups, including Samaritanism (primarily in Israel and the West Bank), the Rastafari movement (primarily in Jamaica), and Druze (primarily in Syria and Lebanon).

សាសនា​នៅ​ប្រទេស​អ៊ីរ៉ង់

Zoroastrian Fire Temple

Iranian religions are ancient religions whose roots predate the Islamization of Greater Iran. Nowadays these religions are practiced only by minorities.

  • Zoroastrianism is a religion and philosophy based on the teachings of prophet Zoroaster in the 6th century BC. The Zoroastrians worship the Creator Ahura Mazda. In Zoroastrianism good and evil have distinct sources, with evil trying to destroy the creation of Mazda, and good trying to sustain it.

សាសនា​នៅ​ប្រទេស​ឥណ្ឌា

Hindu statue of Rama in Kalaram Temple (India)
The Buddha, in a Sanskrit manuscript, Nālandā, Bihar, India

Indian religions are practiced or were founded in the Indian subcontinent. They are sometimes classified as the dharmic religions, as they all feature dharma, the specific law of reality and duties expected according to the religion.[៧៥]

  • Jainism, taught primarily by Parsva (9th century BCE) and Mahavira (6th century BCE), is an ancient Indian religion that prescribes a path of non-violence for all forms of living beings in this world. Jains are found mostly in India.
Fresco of Guru Nanak at Goindwal Sahib Gurdwara
  • Sikhism is a monotheistic religion founded on the teachings of Guru Nanak and ten successive Sikh gurus in 15th century Punjab. It is the fifth-largest organized religion in the world, with approximately 30 million Sikhs.[៨២][៨៣] Sikhs are expected to embody the qualities of a Sant-Sipāhī—a saint-soldier, have control over one's internal vices and be able to be constantly immersed in virtues clarified in the Guru Granth Sahib. The principal beliefs of Sikhi are faith in Waheguru—represented by the phrase ik ōaṅkār, meaning one God, who prevails in everything, along with a praxis in which the Sikh is enjoined to engage in social reform through the pursuit of justice for all human beings.

ប្រពៃណី​នៃ​ជនជាតិ​នៅ​ទ្វីបអាហ្វ្រិក

African traditional religion encompasses the traditional religious beliefs of people in Africa. There are also notable African diasporic religions practiced in the Americas.

North Africa:

Northeast Africa:

  • Waaq (Horn of Africa)
Shango, the Orisha (god) of fire, lightning, and thunder, in the Yoruba religion, depicted on horseback

West Africa:

Central Africa:

Southeast Africa:

Southern Africa:

Diaspora:

ជំនឿ​​តាម​ស្រុក​ភូមិ​

Incense burner in China

The term folk refers to a broad category of traditional religions that includes shamanism and elements of animism and ancestor worship, where traditional means "indigenous, that which is aboriginal or foundational, handed down from generation to generation…".[៨៤] These are religions that are closely associated with a particular group of people, ethnicity or tribe; they often have no formal creeds or sacred texts.[៨៥] Some faiths are syncretic, fusing diverse religious beliefs and practices.[៨៦]

Folk religions are often omitted as a category in surveys even in countries where they are widely practiced, e.g. in China.[៨៥]

សាសនា​បង្កើត​ឡើង​ពេល​ថ្មីៗ

ឯកសារ:Sepulveda Unitarian Universalist Society Sanctuary.PNG
A Modern-style Unitarian Universalist sanctuary

New religious movements include:

  • Shinshūkyō is a general category for a wide variety of religious movements founded in Japan since the 19th century. These movements share almost nothing in common except the place of their founding. The largest religious movements centered in Japan include Soka Gakkai, Tenrikyo, and Seicho-No-Ie among hundreds of smaller groups.
  • Cao Đài is a syncretistic, monotheistic religion, established in Vietnam in 1926.
  • Raëlism is a new religious movement founded in 1974 teaching that humans were created by aliens. It is numerically the world's largest UFO religion.
  • Noahidism is a Biblical-Talmudic and monotheistic ideology for non-Jews based on the Seven Laws of Noah, and on their traditional interpretations within Judaism.
  • Scientology teaches that people are immortal beings who have forgotten their true nature. Its method of spiritual rehabilitation is a type of counseling known as auditing, in which practitioners aim to consciously re-experience and understand painful or traumatic events and decisions in their past in order to free themselves of their limiting effects.
  • Eckankar is a pantheistic religion with the purpose of making God an everyday reality in one's life.
  • Wicca is a neo-pagan religion first popularised in 1954 by British civil servant Gerald Gardner, involving the worship of a God and Goddess.
  • Druidry is a religion promoting harmony with nature, and drawing on the practices of the druids.

Sociological classifications of religious movements suggest that within any given religious group, a community can resemble various types of structures, including "churches", "denominations", "sects", "cults", and "institutions".

បញ្ហាចម្រូងចម្រាស់

សេដ្ឋកិច្ច

The national income of countries correlates negatively with their religiosity.[៦]

While there has been much debate about how religion affects the economy of countries, in general there is a negative correlation between religiosity and the wealth of nations. In other words, the richer a nation is, the less religious it tends to be.[៨៧] However, sociologist and political economist Max Weber has argued that Protestant Christian countries are wealthier because of their Protestant work ethic.[៨៨]

សុខភាព

Mayo Clinic researchers examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality, and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. The authors reported that: "Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide."[៨៩]

The authors of a subsequent study concluded that the influence of religion on health is "largely beneficial", based on a review of related literature.[៩០] According to academic James W. Jones, several studies have discovered "positive correlations between religious belief and practice and mental and physical health and longevity." [៩១]

An analysis of data from the 1998 US General Social Survey, whilst broadly confirming that religious activity was associated with better health and well-being, also suggested that the role of different dimensions of spirituality/religiosity in health is rather more complicated. The results suggested "that it may not be appropriate to generalize findings about the relationship between spirituality/religiosity and health from one form of spirituality/religiosity to another, across denominations, or to assume effects are uniform for men and women.[៩២]

អំពើហិង្សា

The Crusades were a series of a military campaigns fought mainly between Christian Europe and Muslims. Shown here is a battle scene from the First Crusade.

Charles Selengut characterizes the phrase "religion and violence" as "jarring", asserting that "religion is thought to be opposed to violence and a force for peace and reconciliation. He acknowledges, however, that "the history and scriptures of the world's religions tell stories of violence and war as they speak of peace and love."[៩៣]

Hector Avalos argues that, because religions claim divine favor for themselves, over and against other groups, this sense of righteousness leads to violence because conflicting claims to superiority, based on unverifiable appeals to God, cannot be adjudicated objectively.[៩៤]

Critics of religion Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins go further and argue that religions do tremendous harm to society by using violence to promote their goals, in ways that are endorsed and exploited by their leaders.[៩៥][ទំព័រត្រូវការ][៩៦][ទំព័រត្រូវការ]

Regina Schwartz argues that all monotheistic religions are inherently violent because of an exclusivism that inevitably fosters violence against those that are considered outsiders.[៩៧] Lawrence Wechsler asserts that Schwartz isn't just arguing that Abrahamic religions have a violent legacy, but that the legacy is actually genocidal in nature.[៩៨]

Byron Bland asserts that one of the most prominent reasons for the "rise of the secular in Western thought" was the reaction against the religious violence of the 16th and 17th centuries. He asserts that "(t)he secular was a way of living with the religious differences that had produced so much horror. Under secularity, political entities have a warrant to make decisions independent from the need to enforce particular versions of religious orthodoxy. Indeed, they may run counter to certain strongly held beliefs if made in the interest of common welfare. Thus, one of the important goals of the secular is to limit violence."[៩៩]

Nonetheless, believers have used similar arguments when responding to atheists in these discussions, pointing to the widespread imprisonment and mass murder of individuals under atheist states in the twentieth century:[១០០][១០១][១០២]

And who can deny that Stalin and Mao, not to mention Pol Pot and a host of others, all committed atrocities in the name of a Communist ideology that was explicitly atheistic? Who can dispute that they did their bloody deeds by claiming to be establishing a 'new man' and a religion-free utopia? These were mass murders performed with atheism as a central part of their ideological inspiration, they were not mass murders done by people who simply happened to be atheist.

In response to such a line of argument, however, author Sam Harris writes:

The problem with fascism and communism, however, is not that they are too critical of religion; the problem is that they are too much like religions. Such regimes are dogmatic to the core and generally give rise to personality cults that are indistinguishable from cults of religious hero worship. Auschwitz, the gulag and the killing fields were not examples of what happens when human beings reject religious dogma; they are examples of political, racial and nationalistic dogma run amok. There is no society in human history that ever suffered because its people became too reasonable.

Richard Dawkins has stated that Stalin's atrocities were influenced not by atheism but by dogmatic Marxism,[១០៤] and concludes that while Stalin and Mao happened to be atheists, they did not do their deeds in the name of atheism.[១០៥] On other occasions, Dawkins has replied to the argument that Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin were antireligious with the response that Hitler and Stalin also grew moustaches, in an effort to show the argument as fallacious.[១០៦] Instead, Dawkins argues in The God Delusion that "What matters is not whether Hitler and Stalin were atheists, but whether atheism systematically influences people to do bad things. There is not the smallest evidence that it does." Dawkins adds that Hitler in fact, repeatedly affirmed a strong belief in Christianity,[១០៧] but that his atrocities were no more attributable to his theism than Stalin's or Mao's were to their atheism. In all three cases, he argues, the perpetrators' level of religiosity was incidental.[១០៨] D'Souza responds that an individual need not explicitly invoke atheism in committing atrocities if it is already implied in his worldview, as is the case in Marxism.[១០៩]

ច្បាប់

The study of law and religion is a relatively new field, with several thousand scholars involved in law schools, and academic departments including political science, religion, and history since 1980.[១១០] Scholars in the field are not only focused on strictly legal issues about religious freedom or non-establishment, but also study religions as they are qualified through judicial discourses or legal understanding of religious phenomena. Exponents look at canon law, natural law, and state law, often in a comparative perspective.[១១១][១១២] Specialists have explored themes in western history regarding Christianity and justice and mercy, rule and equity, and discipline and love.[១១៣] Common topics of interest include marriage and the family[១១៤] and human rights.[១១៥] Outside of Christianity, scholars have looked at law and religion links in the Muslim Middle East[១១៦] and pagan Rome.[១១៧]

Studies have focused on secularization.[១១៨][១១៩] In particular the issue of wearing religious symbols in public, such as headscarves that are banned in French schools, have received scholarly attention in the context of human rights and feminism.[១២០]

វិទ្យាសាស្ត្រ

Religious knowledge, according to religious practitioners, may be gained from religious leaders, sacred texts, scriptures, or personal revelation. Some religions view such knowledge as unlimited in scope and suitable to answer any question; others see religious knowledge as playing a more restricted role, often as a complement to knowledge gained through physical observation. Adherents to various religious faiths often maintain that religious knowledge obtained via sacred texts or revelation is absolute and infallible and thereby creates an accompanying religious cosmology, although the proof for such is often tautological and generally limited to the religious texts and revelations that form the foundation of their belief.

In contrast, the scientific method gains knowledge by testing hypotheses to develop theories through elucidation of facts or evaluation by experiments and thus only answers cosmological questions about the universe that can be observed and measured. It develops theories of the world which best fit physically observed evidence. All scientific knowledge is subject to later refinement, or even outright rejection, in the face of additional evidence. Scientific theories that have an overwhelming preponderance of favorable evidence are often treated as de facto verities in general parlance, such as the theories of general relativity and natural selection to explain respectively the mechanisms of gravity and evolution.

Regarding religion and science, Albert Einstein states (1940): "For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action; it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts…Now, even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determine the goals, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up." [១២១]

ការ​បូជា​សត្វ

Animal sacrifice is the ritual killing and offering of an animal to appease or maintain favour with a deity. Such forms of sacrifice are practised within many religions around the world and have appeared historically in almost all cultures.

ទម្រង់ទាក់ទង​គ្នា​នៃ​​គំនិត

អបិយជំនឿ

Superstition has been described as "the incorrect establishment of cause and effect" or a false conception of causation.[១២២] Religion is more complex and includes social institutions and morality. But religions may include superstitions or make use of magical thinking. Adherents of one religion sometimes think of other religions as superstition.[១២៣][១២៤] Some atheists, deists, and skeptics regard religious belief as superstition.

Greek and Roman pagans, who saw their relations with the gods in political and social terms, scorned the man who constantly trembled with fear at the thought of the gods (deisidaimonia), as a slave might fear a cruel and capricious master. The Romans called such fear of the gods superstitio.[១២៥] Early Christianity was outlawed as a superstitio Iudaica, a "Jewish superstition", by Domitian in the 80s AD. In AD 425, when Rome had become Christian, Theodosius II outlawed pagan traditions as superstitious.

The Roman Catholic Church considers superstition to be sinful in the sense that it denotes a lack of trust in the divine providence of God and, as such, is a violation of the first of the Ten Commandments. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that superstition "in some sense represents a perverse excess of religion" (para. #2110). "Superstition," it says, "is a deviation of religious feeling and of the practices this feeling imposes. It can even affect the worship we offer the true God, e.g., when one attributes an importance in some way magical to certain practices otherwise lawful or necessary. To attribute the efficacy of prayers or of sacramental signs to their mere external performance, apart from the interior dispositions that they demand is to fall into superstition. Cf. Matthew 23:16-22" (para. #2111)

ទេវកថា

The word myth has several meanings.

  1. A traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon;
  2. A person or thing having only an imaginary or unverifiable existence; or
  3. A metaphor for the spiritual potentiality in the human being.[១២៦]

Ancient polytheistic religions, such as those of Greece, Rome, and Scandinavia, are usually categorized under the heading of mythology. Religions of pre-industrial peoples, or cultures in development, are similarly called "myths" in the anthropology of religion. The term "myth" can be used pejoratively by both religious and non-religious people. By defining another person's religious stories and beliefs as mythology, one implies that they are less real or true than one's own religious stories and beliefs. Joseph Campbell remarked, "Mythology is often thought of as other people's religions, and religion can be defined as mis-interpreted mythology."[១២៧]

In sociology, however, the term myth has a non-pejorative meaning. There, myth is defined as a story that is important for the group whether or not it is objectively or provably true. Examples include the death and resurrection of Jesus, which, to Christians, explains the means by which they are freed from sin and is also ostensibly a historical event. But from a mythological outlook, whether or not the event actually occurred is unimportant. Instead, the symbolism of the death of an old "life" and the start of a new "life" is what is most significant. Religious believers may or may not accept such symbolic interpretations.

អសាសនានិយម និង ការមិន​​ប្រកាន់ជំនឿសាសនា

Ranjit Singh established secular rule over Punjab in the early 19th century.

The terms "atheist" (lack of belief in any gods) and "agnostic" (belief in the unknowability of the existence of gods), though specifically contrary to theistic (e.g. Christian, Jewish, and Muslim) religious teachings, do not by definition mean the opposite of "religious". There are religions (including Buddhism and Taoism), in fact, that classify some of their followers as agnostic, atheistic, or nontheistic. The true opposite of "religious" is the word "irreligious". Irreligion describes an absence of any religion; antireligion describes an active opposition or aversion toward religions in general.

As religion became a more personal matter in Western culture, discussions of society became more focused on political and scientific meaning, and religious attitudes (dominantly Christian) were increasingly seen as irrelevant for the needs of the European world. On the political side, Ludwig Feuerbach recast Christian beliefs in light of humanism, paving the way for Karl Marx's famous characterization of religion as "the opium of the people". Meanwhile, in the scientific community, T.H. Huxley in 1869 coined the term "agnostic," a term—subsequently adopted by such figures as Robert Ingersoll—that, while directly conflicting with and novel to Christian tradition, is accepted and even embraced in some other religions. Later, Bertrand Russell told the world Why I Am Not a Christian, which influenced several later authors to discuss their breakaway from their own religious upbringings from Islam to Hinduism.

Some atheists also construct parody religions, for example, the Church of the SubGenius or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which parodies the equal time argument employed by intelligent design Creationism.[១២៨] Parody religions may also be considered a post-modern approach to religion. For instance, in Discordianism, it may be hard to tell if even these "serious" followers are not just taking part in an even bigger joke. This joke, in turn, may be part of a greater path to enlightenment, and so on ad infinitum.

ការរិះគន់សាសនា

Religious criticism has a long history, going back at least as far as the 5th century BCE. During classical times, there were religious critics in ancient Greece, such as Diagoras "the atheist" of Melos, and in the 1st century BCE in Rome, with Titus Lucretius Carus's De Rerum Natura.

During the Middle Ages and continuing into the Renaissance, potential critics of religion were persecuted and largely forced to remain silent. There were notable critics like Giordano Bruno, who was burned at the stake for disagreeing with religious authority.[១២៩]

In the 17th and 18th century with the Enlightenment, thinkers like David Hume and Voltaire criticized religion.

In the 19th century, Charles Darwin and the theory of evolution led to increased skepticism about religion. Thomas Huxley, Jeremy Bentham, Karl Marx, Charles Bradlaugh, Robert Ingersol, and Mark Twain were noted 19th-century and early-20th-century critics. In the 20th century, Bertrand Russell, Siegmund Freud, and others continued religious criticism.

Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, Victor J. Stenger, and the late Christopher Hitchens were active critics during the late 20th century and early 21st century.

Critics consider religion to be outdated, harmful to the individual (e.g. brainwashing of children, faith healing, female genital mutilation, circumcision), harmful to society (e.g. holy wars, terrorism, wasteful distribution of resources), to impede the progress of science, to exert social control, and to encourage immoral acts (e.g. blood sacrifice, discrimination against homosexuals and women, and certain forms of sexual violence such as marital rape).[១៣០][១៣១][១៣២] A major criticism of many religions is that they require beliefs that are irrational, unscientific, or unreasonable, because religious beliefs and traditions lack scientific or rational foundations.

Some modern-day critics, such as Bryan Caplan, hold that religion lacks utility in human society; they may regard religion as irrational.[១៣៣] Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Ebadi has spoken out against undemocratic Islamic countries justifying "oppressive acts" in the name of Islam.[១៣៤]

សូមអាន​បន្ថែម

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Portal/images/r' not found.

ឯកសារ​យោង

  1. Talal Asad, The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category, 1982
  2. The Everything World's Religions Book: Explore the Beliefs, Traditions and Cultures of Ancient and Modern Religions, page 1 Kenneth Shouler - 2010
  3. Oxford Dictionaries mythology, retrieved 9 September 2012
  4. Kant, Immanuel (2001). Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge University Press. p. 177. ល.ស.ប.អ. 9780521799980. 
  5. Émile Durkheim|Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin, p.10.
  6. ៦,០ ៦,១ "Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism" (PDF). WIN-Gallup International. 27 July 2012. Retrieved 24 August 2012.
  7. Women More Religious Than Men retrieved 14 July 2013
  8. Soul Searching:The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers - Page 77, Christian Smith, Melina Lundquist Denton - 2005
  9. Christ in Japanese Culture: Theological Themes in Shusaku Endo's Literary Works, Emi Mase-Hasegawa - 2008
  10. New poll reveals how churchgoers mix eastern new age beliefs retrieved 26 July 2013
  11. ទំព័រគំរូ:OEtymD
  12. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
  13. In The Pagan Christ: Recovering the Lost Light. Toronto. Thomas Allen, 2004. ISBN 0-88762-145-7
  14. In The Power of Myth, with Bill Moyers, ed. Betty Sue Flowers, New York, Anchor Books, 1991. ISBN 0-385-41886-8
  15. Johan Huizinga, The Waning of the Middle Ages (1919) 1924:75.
  16. Max Müller, Natural Religion, p.33, 1889
  17. Lewis & Short, A Latin Dictionary
  18. Max Müller. Introduction to the science of religion. p. 28.
  19. Kuroda, Toshio and Jacqueline I. Stone, translator. "The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law." Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23.3-4 (1996)
  20. Neil McMullin. Buddhism and the State in Sixteenth-Century Japan. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1984.
  21. Hershel Edelheit, Abraham J. Edelheit, History of Zionism: A Handbook and Dictionary, p.3, citing Solomon Zeitlin, The Jews. Race, Nation, or Religion? ( Philadelphia: Dropsie College Press, 1936).
  22. Colin Turner. Islam without Allah? New York: Routledge, 2000. pp. 11-12.
  23. The Chambers Dictionary. Chambers.
  24. Religion. Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  25. Paul James and Peter Mandaville (2010). Globalization and Culture, Vol. 2: Globalizing Religions. London: Sage Publications. https://www.academia.edu/4416072/Globalization_and_Culture_Vol._2_Globalizing_Religions_editor_with_Peter_Mandaville_Sage_Publications_London_2010. 
  26. Tylor, E.B. (1871) Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. Vol. 1. London: John Murray; (p.424).
  27. Geertz, C. (1993) Religion as a cultural system. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, Geertz, Clifford, pp.87-125. Fontana Press.
  28. (ibid, p. 90)
  29. Vergote, A. (1996) Religion, belief and unbelief. A Psychological Study, Leuven University Press. (p. 16)
  30. Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  31. (ibid, p. 37)
  32. (ibid, pp. 40–41)
  33. James, W. (1902) The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. Longmans, Green, and Co. (p. 31)
  34. (ibid, p. 34)
  35. (ibid, p. 38)
  36. Frederick Ferré, F. (1967) Basic modern philosophy of religion. Scribner, (p.82).
  37. Tillich, P. (1957) Dynamics of faith. Harper Perennial; (p.1).
  38. Tillich, P. (1959) Theology of Culture. Oxford University Press; (p.8).
  39. Hueston A. Finlay. "‘Feeling of absolute dependence’ or ‘absolute feeling of dependence’? A question revisited". Religious Studies 41.1 (2005), pp.81-94.
  40. Max Müller. "Lectures on the origin and growth of religion."
  41. Pecorino, P.A. (2001) Philosophy of Religion. Online Textbook. Philip A. Pecorino.
  42. Monaghan, John; Just, Peter (2000). Social & Cultural Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 126. ល.ស.ប.អ. 978-0-19-285346-2. 
  43. ៤៣,០ ៤៣,១ Monaghan, John; Just, Peter (2000). Social & Cultural Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 124. ល.ស.ប.អ. 978-0-19-285346-2. 
  44. Vergote, Antoine, Religion, belief and unbelief: a psychological study, Leuven University Press, 1997, p. 89
  45. ៤៥,០ ៤៥,១ ៤៥,២ Daniel Dubuisson, The Western Construction of Religion
  46. Daniel Dubuisson. "Exporting the Local: Recent Perspectives on 'Religion' as a Cultural Category", Religion Compass, 1.6 (2007), p.792.
  47. Tomoko Masuzawa, The Invention of World Religions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
  48. Fitzgerald, Timothy (2007). Discourse on Civility and Barbarity. Oxford University Press. pp. 45–46. 
  49. Fitzgerald 2007, ទ. 194
  50. Fitzgerald 2007, ទ. 268
  51. Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1993 p.34-35.
  52. S. N. Balagangadhara. The Heathen in His Blindness... New York: Brill Academic Publishers, 1994. p.159.
  53. ៥៣,០ ៥៣,១ Brian Kemble Pennington Was Hinduism Invented? New York: Oxford University Press US, 2005. ISBN 0-19-516655-8
  54. Josephson, Jason Ānanda. (2012) The Invention of Religion in Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  55. Josephson 2012, p. 257
  56. George A. Lindbeck, Nature of Doctrine (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1984), 33.
  57. Nicholas de Lange, Judaism, Oxford University Press, 1986
  58. Hinnells, John R. (2005). The Routledge companion to the study of religion. Routledge. pp. 439–440. ល.ស.ប.អ. 0-415-33311-3. http://books.google.com/?id=IGspjXKxIf8C។ បានយកមក 2009-09-17. 
  59. Timothy Fitzgerald. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press USA, 2000.
  60. Craig R. Prentiss. Religion and the Creation of Race and Ethnicity. New York: NYU Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8147-6701-X
  61. Tomoko Masuzawa. The Invention of World Religions, or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. ISBN 0-226-50988-5
  62. Russell T. McCutcheon. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.
  63. Nicholas Lash. The beginning and the end of 'religion'. Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-56635-5
  64. Joseph Bulbulia. "Are There Any Religions? An Evolutionary Explanation." Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 17.2 (2005), pp.71-100
  65. Harvey, Graham (2000). Indigenous Religions: A Companion. (Ed: Graham Harvey). London and New York: Cassell. Page 06.
  66. A Common Word
  67. C1 World Dialogue
  68. Islam and Buddhism Common Ground
  69. World Interfaith Harmony Week
  70. UN resolution
  71. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. "The Global Religious Landscape". Retrieved December 18, 2012.
  72. Darrell J. Turner. "Religion: Year In Review 2000". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 16 June 2012.
  73. but cf: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/#religions
  74. http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton61/st02_27.pdf
  75. Mittal, Sushil (2003). Surprising Bedfellows: Hindus and Muslims in Medieval and Early Modern India. Lexington Books. p. 103. ល.ស.ប.អ. 9780739106730. 
  76. P. 484 Merriam-Webster's Encyclopedia of World Religions By Wendy Doniger, M. Webster, Merriam-Webster, Inc
  77. P. 219 Faith, Religion & Theology By Brennan Hill, Paul F. Knitter, William Madges
  78. P. 6 The World's Great Religions By Yoshiaki Gurney Omura, Selwyn Gurney Champion, Dorothy Short
  79. Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony (2000), Buddhist Thought: A complete introduction to the Indian tradition, Routledge, ISBN 0-203-18593-5 p=194
  80. Smith, E. Gene (2001). Among Tibetan Texts: History and Literature of the Himalayan Plateau. Boston: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-179-3
  81. Kenkyusha's New Japanese-English Dictionary, ISBN 4-7674-2015-6
  82. "Sikhism: What do you know about it?". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/sikhism-what-do-you-know-about-it/2012/08/06/19131ef6-dff1-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_gallery.html។ បានយកមក 13 December 2012. 
  83. Zepps, Josh (6 August 2012). "Sikhs in America: What You Need To Know About The World's Fifth-Largest Religion". Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/sikhs-in-america_n_1748125.html។ បានយកមក 13 December 2012. 
  84. J. O. Awolalu (1976) What is African Traditional Religion? Studies in Comparative Religion Vol. 10, No. 2. (Spring, 1976).
  85. ៨៥,០ ៨៥,១ Pew Research Center (2012) The Global Religious Landscape. A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
  86. Central Intelligence Agency. "Religions". World Factbook. Retrieved 3 January 2013.
  87. WIN-Gallup. "Global Index of religion and atheism" (PDF). Retrieved 21 October 2012.
  88. Max Weber, [1904] 1920. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
  89. Paul S. Mueller, MD; David J. Plevak, MD; Teresa A. Rummans, MD. "Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Medicine: Implications for Clinical Practice" (PDF). Retrieved 13 November 2010. We reviewed published studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and subject reviews that examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life, and other health outcomes. We also reviewed articles that provided suggestions on how clinicians might assess and support the spiritual needs of patients. Most studies have shown that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes, including greater longevity, coping skills, and health-related quality of life (even during terminal illness) and less anxiety, depression, and suicide{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  90. Seybold, Kevin S., Peter C. Hill (Feb 2001). "The Role of Religion and Spirituality in Mental and Physical Health". Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 (1): 21–24. DOI:10.1111/1467-8721.00106.
  91. Jones, James W. (2004). "Religion, Health, and the Psychology of Religion: How the Research on Religion and Health Helps Us Understand Religion". Journal of Religion and Health 43 (4): 317–328. DOI:10.1007/s10943-004-4299-3.
  92. Maselko, J. and Kubzansky, L. D. (2006) Gender differences in religious practices, spiritual experiences and health: Results from the US General Social Survey. Social Science & Medicine, Vol 62(11), June, 2848-2860.
  93. Selengut, Charles (2008-04-28). Sacred fury: understanding religious violence. p. 1. ល.ស.ប.អ. 978-0-7425-6084-0. http://books.google.com/?id=mOqtEkGlq0cC&pg=PR7&dq=%22sectarian+violence%22+%22religious+violence%22#v=onepage&q=%22sectarian%20violence%22%20%22religious%20violence%22&f=false. 
  94. Avalos, Hector (2005). Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. 
  95. Hitchens, Christopher (2007). God is not Great. Twelve. 
  96. Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam Books. 
  97. The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism By Regina M. Schwartz. University of Chicago Press. 1998. 
  98. Wechsler, Lawrence. "Mayhem and Monotheism" (PDF).
  99. Bland, Byron (May 2003). "Evil Enemies: The Convergence of Religion and Politics" (PDF). p. 4.
  100. John S. Feinberg, Paul D. Feinberg (2010). Ethics for a Brave New World. Crossway Books. ល.ស.ប.អ. 9781433526466. http://books.google.com/books?id=Nl-f5SKq9mgC&pg=PA697&dq=Aleksandr+Solzhenitsyn+But+if+I+were+asked+today+to+formulate+as+concisely+as+possible+the+main+cause+of+the+ruinous+revolution+that+swallowed+up+some+60+million+of+our+people,+I+could+not+put+it+more+accurately+than+to+repeat:+'Men+have+forgotten+God;+that's+why#v=onepage&q&f=false។ បានយកមក 2007-10-18. "Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.' Since then I have spend well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.'" 
  101. Gregory Koukl. "The Real Murderers: Atheism or Christianity?". Stand To Reason. Retrieved 2007-10-18.
  102. ១០២,០ ១០២,១ Dinesh D'Souza. "Answering Atheist's Arguments". Catholic Education Resource Center. Retrieved 2007-10-18.
  103. 10 myths and 10 truths about Atheism Sam Harris
  104. Dawkins, Richard (2006-09-18). The God Delusion. Ch. 7: Houghton Mifflin. ល.ស.ប.អ. 978-0-618-68000-9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Delusion. 
  105. Interview with Richard Dawkins conducted by Stephen Sackur for BBC News 24’s HardTalk programme, July 24th 2007. [១]
  106. The Video: Bill O'Reilly Interviews Richard Dawkins
  107. Baynes, Norman H., ed. (1969). The Speeches of Adolf Hitler: April 1922-August 1939. New York: Howard Fertig. pp. 19-20, 37, 240, 370, 371, 375, 378, 382, 383, 385-388, 390-392, 398-399, 402, 405-407, 410, 1018, 1544, 1594.
  108. Dawkins 2006, ទ. 309
  109. Answering Atheist’s Arguments Dinesh D'Souza
  110. John Witte, "The Study of Law and Religion in the United States: An Interim Report", Ecclesiastical Law Journal (2012) 14#3, pp. 327–354.
  111. Norman Doe, Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction (2011).
  112. W. Cole Durham and Brett G. Scharffs, eds., Law and religion: national, international, and comparative perspectives (Aspen Pub, 2010).
  113. John Witte Jr. and Frank S. Alexander, eds., Christianity and Law: An Introduction (Cambridge U.P. 2008)
  114. John Witte Jr., From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition (1997).
  115. John Witte, Jr., The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism (2008).
  116. Ann Elizabeth Mayer, in JSTOR "Law and Religion in the Muslim Middle East", American Journal of Comparative Law (1987) 35#1, pp. 127–184.
  117. Alan Watson, The state, law, and religion: pagan Rome (University of Georgia Press, 1992).
  118. Silvio Ferrari, "Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective", Ecclesiastical Law Journal (2012) 14#3, pp. 355–370.
  119. Rafael Palomino, "Legal dimensions of secularism: challenges and problems", Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice (2012) vol. 2, pp. 208–225.
  120. Karima Bennoune, "Secularism and human rights: A contextual analysis of headscarves, religious expression, and women's equality under international law", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 45 (2006): 367.
  121. Einstein, Albert (21 Sep 1940). "Personal God Concept Causes Science-Religion Conflict". The Science News-Letter 38 (12): 181–182. DOI:10.2307/3916567.
  122. Kevin R. Foster and Hanna Kokko, "The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour", Proc. R. Soc. B (2009) 276, 31–37[តំណភ្ជាប់ខូច]
  123. Boyer (2001). "Why Belief". Religion Explained. http://books.google.com/books?id=wreF80OHTicC&pg=PA297&lpg=PA297&dq=%22fang+too+were+quite+amazed%22. 
  124. Fitzgerald 2007, ទ. 232
  125. Veyne 1987, p 211 [ត្រូវការបញ្ជាក់]
  126. Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth, p. 22 ISBN 0-385-24774-5
  127. Joseph Campbell, Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor. Ed. Eugene Kennedy. New World Library ISBN 1-57731-202-3.
  128. USA Today - Spaghetti Monster is noodling around with faith
  129. BRUNO His Life and Thought;Giordano Bruno (1548-1600)
  130. Islam Channel censured by Ofcom | Media | theguardian.com
  131. BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Cleric 'must deny' views on rape
  132. Valley paper criticized over pastor's column on spousal rape | Alaska Newsreader | ADN.com
  133. Bryan Caplan. "Why Religious Beliefs Are Irrational, and Why Economists Should Care". The article about religion and irrationality.
  134. Earth Dialogues 2006 Conference, Brisbane. "In these countries, Islamic rulers want to solve 21st century issues with laws belonging to 14 centuries ago. Their views of human rights are exactly the same as it was 1400 years ago."

កំណត់សម្គាល់

  1. While religion is difficult to define, one standard model of religion, used in religious studies courses, was proposed by Clifford Geertz, who simply called it a "cultural system" (Clifford Geertz, Religion as a Cultural System, 1973). A critique of Geertz's model by Talal Asad categorized religion as "an anthropological category." (Talal Asad, The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category, 1982.)
  2. That is how, according to Durkheim, Buddhism is a religion. "In default of gods, Buddhism admits the existence of sacred things, namely, the four noble truths and the practices derived from them" (ibid, p. 45).
  3. Hinduism is variously defined as a "religion", "set of religious beliefs and practices", "religious tradition" etc. For a discussion on the topic, see: "Establishing the boundaries" in Gavin Flood (2003), pp. 1-17. René Guénon in his Introduction to the Study of the Hindu doctrines (1921 ed.), Sophia Perennis, ISBN 0-900588-74-8, proposes a definition of the term "religion" and a discussion of its relevance (or lack of) to Hindu doctrines (part II, chapter 4, p. 58).

គន្ធនិទ្ទេស

  • Saint Augustine; The Confessions of Saint Augustine (John K. Ryan translator); Image (1960), ISBN 0-385-02955-1.
  • Barzilai, Gad; Law and Religion; The International Library of Essays in Law and Society; Ashgate (2007), ISBN 978-0-7546-2494-3
  • Brodd, Jefferey (2003). World Religions. Winona, MN: Saint Mary's Press. ល.ស.ប.អ. 978-0-88489-725-5. 
  • Descartes, René; Meditations on First Philosophy; Bobbs-Merril (1960), ISBN 0-672-60191-5.
  • Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); Our Oriental Heritage; MJF Books (1997), ISBN 1-56731-012-5.
  • Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); Caesar and Christ; MJF Books (1994), ISBN 1-56731-014-1
  • Durant, Will (& Ariel (uncredited)); The Age of Faith; Simon & Schuster (1980), ISBN 0-671-01200-2.
  • Marija Gimbutas 1989. The Language of the Goddess. Thames and Hudson New York
  • Gonick, Larry; The Cartoon History of the Universe; Doubleday, vol. 1 (1978) ISBN 0-385-26520-4, vol. II (1994) ISBN#0-385-42093-5, W. W. Norton, vol. III (2002) ISBN 0-393-05184-6.
  • Haisch, Bernard The God Theory: Universes, Zero-point Fields, and What's Behind It All—discussion of science vs. religion (Preface[តំណភ្ជាប់ខូច]), Red Wheel/Weiser, 2006, ISBN 1-57863-374-5
  • Ramsay, Michael, Abp. Beyond Religion? Cincinnati, Ohio: Forward Movement Publications, (cop. 1964).
  • Lao Tzu; Tao Te Ching (Victor H. Mair translator); Bantam (1998).
  • Marx, Karl; "Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right", Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, (1844).
  • Palmer, Spencer J., et al. Religions of the World: a Latter-day Saint [Mormon] View. 2nd general ed., tev. and enl. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1997. xv, 294 p., ill. ISBN 0-8425-2350-2
  • Saler, Benson; "Conceptualizing Religion: Immanent Anthropologists, Transcendent Natives, and Unbounded Categories" (1990), ISBN 1-57181-219-9
  • Schuon, Frithjof. The Transcendent Unity of Religions, in series, Quest Books. 2nd Quest ... rev. ed. Wheaton, Ill.: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993, cop. 1984. xxxiv, 173 p. ISBN 0-8356-0587-6
  • The Holy Bible, King James Version; New American Library (1974).
  • The Koran; Penguin (2000), ISBN 0-14-044558-7.
  • The Origin of Live & Death, African Creation Myths; Heinemann (1966).
  • Poems of Heaven and Hell from Ancient Mesopotamia; Penguin (1971).
  • The World Almanac (annual), World Almanac Books, ISBN 0-88687-964-7.
  • The Serotonin System and Spiritual Experiences - American Journal of Psychiatry 160:1965-1969, November 2003.
  • United States Constitution
  • Selected Work Marcus Tullius Cicero
  • The World Almanac (for numbers of adherents of various religions), 2005
  • Religion [First Edition]. Winston King. Encyclopedia of Religion. Ed. Lindsay Jones. Vol. 11. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005. p7692-7701.
  • World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective by Andrey Korotayev, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2004, ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.

On religion definition:

Studies of religion in particular geographical areas:

  • A. Khanbaghi. The Fire, the Star and the Cross: Minority Religions in Medieval and Early Modern Iran (IB Tauris; 2006) 268 pages. Social, political and cultural history of religious minorities in Iran, c. 226-1722 AD.

ស្រាវជ្រាវអាន​បន្ថែម

ភ្ជាប់​ទៅ​បណ្តាញ​ខាង​ក្រៅ

ទំព័រគំរូ:Religion topics ទំព័រគំរូ:Philosophy of religion ទំព័រគំរូ:Philosophy topics

ទំព័រគំរូ:Link FA ទំព័រគំរូ:Link FA ទំព័រគំរូ:Link FA