វិគីភីឌា:សារ ទំព័រគំរូ/Disputes

WP:DT redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Deletion today or Wikipedia:Dynamic tension.

សូមមើលផងដែរ: Wikipedia:Neutrality templates និង Template:Dispute templates

ផ្លូវកាត់s: WP:TM/DISP WP:TM/D

Dispute templates are used to alert other editors that work is needed on a certain article, and auto-categorize pages so that patrolling editors can aid their talent to the problem. The primary purpose of this page is to display and discuss the use of these sometimes controversial aids to joint edit collaboration.

They should normally not be used without a clear description from the applying editor of the rationale, preferably presented in a numbered list form on the article's talk page, in a section which includes the name of the template that was applied. As these items are dealt with, it is suggested each line be struck through. Some guidance should be given by the posting editor as to what action will resolve the matter when using section and article (page) tagging templates.

It is preferable that in-line templates be applied to content that is being objected to on bias or fact grounds. Inline templates are preferred because they can be attached directly to disputed sentences. Section templates follow next in preference to tagging a whole article.

Many editors consider use of any banner template in an article a serious measure of last resort, and would prefer other measures be exhausted before such detractions from the project be used. If one must be used, please make a thorough note listing deficiencies or items being disputed in bulleted or numbered paragraph format under a clear notice section heading on the article's talk page.

Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.

សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងលើគេបង្អស់នៃអត្ថបទ

What to type What it makes Where it goes

What to type	What it makes	Where it goes
{{fact}}, {{cn}} or {{citation needed}} Edit Talk Links	^{[ប្រភព?]}	After factual claims that need a citation to back them up. in-line
{{Verify source}} or {{Check}} Edit Talk Links	^{[verification needed]}	After suspect citations or source references in-line
{{Lopsided}} Edit Talk Links	^{[unbalanced opinion]}	One-sided statements in-line
{{Verify credibility}} Edit Talk Links	^{[unreliable source?]}	After suspect citations or source references in-line
{{Dubious}} Edit Talk Links	^{[សង្ស័យ – ពិភាក្សា]}	Disputed statements in-line
{{failed verification}} Edit Talk Links	^{[មិនមែនក្នុងអាគតដ្ឋានដែលបានផ្ដល់ឱ្យទេ]}	After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk. in-line
{{or}} Edit Talk Links	^{[ការស្រាវជ្រាវដើម?]}	After text passages based upon original research in-line
{{syn}} Edit Talk Links	^{[improper synthesis?]}	After text passages based upon improper synthesis in-line
{{Nonspecific}} or {{Unverifiable}} Edit Talk Links	^{[not specific enough to verify]}	After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{fact}}. in-line
{{Who}} Edit Talk Links	^{[នរណា?]}	After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals. in-line
{{POV-statement}} links talk edit	^{[neutrality is disputed]}	after passages that appear to have a non-neutral point of view.

សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងលើគេបង្អស់នៃអត្ថបទ

សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងលើគេបង្អស់នៃអត្ថបទ ឬខាងលើផ្នែកនិមួយៗ

សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងក្នុង ឬខាងលើនៃផ្នែកនិមួយៗ ប៉ុណ្ណោះ

For inline article placement

For placement on talk pages of articles

For placement on talk pages of users

See also